Literature DB >> 17285744

Evaluation of manometric temperature measurement, a process analytical technology tool for freeze-drying: part II measurement of dry-layer resistance.

Xiaolin Charlie Tang1, Steven L Nail, Michael J Pikal.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to study the factors that may cause systematic errors in the manometric temperature measurement (MTM) procedure used to determine product dry-layer resistance to vapor flow. Product temperature and dry-layer resistance were obtained using MTM software installed on a laboratory freeze-dryer. The MTM resistance values were compared with the resistance values obtained using the "vial method." The product dry-layer resistances obtained by MTM, assuming fixed temperature difference (DeltaT; 2 degrees C), were lower than the actual values, especially when the product temperatures and sublimation rates were low, but with DeltaT determined from the pressure rise data, more accurate results were obtained. MTM resistance values were generally lower than the values obtained with the vial method, particularly whenever freeze-drying was conducted under conditions that produced large variations in product temperature (ie, low shelf temperature, low chamber pressure, and without thermal shields). In an experiment designed to magnify temperature heterogeneity, MTM resistance values were much lower than the simple average of the product resistances. However, in experiments where product temperatures were homogenous, good agreement between MTM and "vial-method" resistances was obtained. The reason for the low MTM resistance problem is the fast vapor pressure rise from a few "warm" edge vials or vials with low resistance. With proper use of thermal shields, and the evaluation of DeltaT from the data, MTM resistance data are accurate. Thus, the MTM method for determining dry-layer resistance is a useful tool for freeze-drying process analytical technology.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17285744      PMCID: PMC2750330          DOI: 10.1208/pt070493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  11 in total

Review 1.  Design of freeze-drying processes for pharmaceuticals: practical advice.

Authors:  Xiaolin Tang; Michael J Pikal
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Evaluation of manometric temperature measurement, a process analytical technology tool for freeze-drying: part I, product temperature measurement.

Authors:  Xiaolin Tang; Steven L Nail; Michael J Pikal
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Evaluation of manometric temperature measurement as a method of monitoring product temperature during lyophilization.

Authors:  N Milton; M J Pikal; M L Roy; S L Nail
Journal:  PDA J Pharm Sci Technol       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb

Review 4.  Rational design of stable lyophilized protein formulations: some practical advice.

Authors:  J F Carpenter; M J Pikal; B S Chang; T W Randolph
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Lyophilization of protein formulations in vials: investigation of the relationship between resistance to vapor flow during primary drying and small-scale product collapse.

Authors:  D E Overcashier; T W Patapoff; C C Hsu
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.534

6.  Mass and heat transfer in vial freeze-drying of pharmaceuticals: role of the vial.

Authors:  M J Pikal; M L Roy; S Shah
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Physical chemistry of freeze-drying: measurement of sublimation rates for frozen aqueous solutions by a microbalance technique.

Authors:  M J Pikal; S Shah; D Senior; J E Lang
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  The effect of chamber pressure on heat transfer in the freeze drying of parenteral solutions.

Authors:  S L Nail
Journal:  J Parenter Drug Assoc       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct

9.  Annealing to optimize the primary drying rate, reduce freezing-induced drying rate heterogeneity, and determine T(g)' in pharmaceutical lyophilization.

Authors:  J A Searles; J F Carpenter; T W Randolph
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.534

10.  Freeze-drying of mannitol-trehalose-sodium chloride-based formulations: the impact of annealing on dry layer resistance to mass transfer and cake structure.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Lu; Michael J Pikal
Journal:  Pharm Dev Technol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.133

View more
  6 in total

1.  Freeze-drying process design by manometric temperature measurement: design of a smart freeze-dryer.

Authors:  Xiaolin Charlie Tang; Steven L Nail; Michael J Pikal
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Evaluation of manometric temperature measurement (MTM), a process analytical technology tool in freeze drying, part III: heat and mass transfer measurement.

Authors:  Xiaolin Charlie Tang; Steven L Nail; Michael J Pikal
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Model-Based Product Temperature and Endpoint Determination in Primary Drying of Lyophilization Processes.

Authors:  Alex Juckers; Petra Knerr; Frank Harms; Jochen Strube
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.525

4.  Reduced pressure ice fog technique for controlled ice nucleation during freeze-drying.

Authors:  Sajal M Patel; Chandan Bhugra; Michael J Pikal
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Cycle Development in a Mini-Freeze Dryer: Evaluation of Manometric Temperature Measurement in Small-Scale Equipment.

Authors:  Tim Wenzel; Margit Gieseler; Ahmad M Abdul-Fattah; Henning Gieseler
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  Nano Drug Delivery Platforms for Dental Application: Infection Control and TMJ Management-A Review.

Authors:  Abhishek Lal; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Naseer Ahmed; Afsheen Maqsood; Ruba K Al-Qaisi; Deepti Shrivastava; Zainab Ali Alkhalaf; Amal Mohamed Alanazi; Hasna Rasheed Alshubrmi; Mohammed G Sghaireen; Kumar Chandan Srivastava
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.329

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.