Literature DB >> 17285044

Segmental malalignment with the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis--does it occur?

William R Sears1, Lali H Sekhon, Neil Duggal, Owen D Williamson.   

Abstract

The early clinical results with the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis are encouraging but 2 recent small published series have noted postoperative radiologic kyphosis of the functional spinal unit (FSU) of 4 and 6 degrees. The current study was undertaken to accurately assess the extent of any sagittal deformity after the use of this prosthesis in a substantial, multisurgeon case series. The neutral, erect x-rays of 67 consecutive patients (88 disc levels) operated by one of 3 surgeons, were examined using manual and digital image analysis techniques for FSU sagittal angulation (lordosis), prosthesis shell angulation, segmental olisthesis, and overall cervical alignment. Measurement accuracy was confirmed using interobserver and intraobserver studies. There was a median loss of 2 degrees in FSU lordosis when compared with preoperative imaging (P<0.0001, range: 8-degree loss to 5-degree gain). A median 2 degrees of prosthesis shell kyphosis also occurred (range: 15-degree kyphosis to 12-degree lordosis) but shell angulation correlated weakly with the change in FSU lordosis (rs=0.37, P=0.001). There was a significant difference in the median loss of FSU lordosis between surgeon 1 and surgeons 2 and 3 (3.5 degrees vs. 2 degrees, P=0.005). Median olisthesis of the prosthesis shells was -0.1 mm (range: +1.5 to -2.5 mm). Median postoperative overall cervical lordosis reduced by 4 degrees (P<0.004). A small loss in median FSU lordosis was observed after insertion of the Bryan disc. The observed changes were generally small but varied among both the patients and the surgeons, suggesting that variables may exist which contribute to postoperative sagittal alignment. These are the subject of an accompanying study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17285044     DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211262.13250.f8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [The relevance of the sagittal profile in cervical artificial discs].

Authors:  C Carstens; M Carstens; F Copf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Does design matter? Cervical disc replacements under review.

Authors:  Michael D Staudt; Kaushik Das; Neil Duggal
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  The incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA): a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Baohui Yang; Haopeng Li; Ting Zhang; Xijing He; Siyue Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Current concepts of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a review of literature.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Byeong-Yeol Choi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-08-19

6.  Prognostic factors related to motion dynamics following cervical arthroplasty with a bryan disc: average 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Han-Yong Heo; Sung-Jae Lee; Kwon-Yong Lee; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-06-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.