Literature DB >> 1728408

Spatial distribution of tumor-specific monoclonal antibodies in human melanoma xenografts.

T R Shockley1, K Lin, J A Nagy, R G Tompkins, M L Yarmush, H F Dvorak.   

Abstract

The time-dependent (1-72-h) spatial distribution of three biotinylated anti-melanoma monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), a control MAb, and several macromolecular tracers was studied in two small (4-12-mg), well-characterized human melanoma xenografts (SK-MEL-2, M21) growing in the s.c. space of athymic nude mice. The specific MAbs (436, IND1, and 9.2.27) recognize two different melanoma cell surface antigens (Mr 125,000 glycoprotein melanoma-associated antigen and high molecular weight melanoma-associated antigen) and have equilibrium association constants differing by two orders of magnitude (10(8)-10(10) M-1). SK-MEL-2 tumors were poorly vascularized and were composed of one or several collections of tumor cells with few intratumor blood vessels. In contrast, M21 tumors induced a strong angiogenic response and were organized into multiple small tumor cell nests separated from each other by fine blood vessels. Neither tumor developed extensive connective tissue stroma. In both tumors, hyperpermeable blood vessels were concentrated at the tumor-host interface but some intratumor vessels in M21 tumors were also leaky. Macromolecular tracers extravasated extensively from leaky vessels into tumor stroma but penetrated poorly into tumor parenchyma. All three tumor-specific MAbs stained tumor cell surfaces in a time-dependent fashion such that one-half or more of all tumor cells were stained by 24-48 h. Tumor cell staining was favored by increased density of tumor cell antigens but, at the doses studied, was little affected by differences in affinity among tumor-specific antibodies. The distribution of MAb staining was nonuniform in two respects: (a) peripherally situated tumor cells were more likely to be stained than centrally placed cells, and only in the smallest tumors did MAb reach centrally placed tumor cells; and (b) staining was nonuniform in different parts of the same tumor. The inhomogeneity of tumor cell staining by tumor-specific MAb was attributable to several factors, including: tumor blood vessel number, distribution, perfusion and permeability; distribution of tumor connective tissue stroma; small volume of the parenchymal interstitial space and relatively impaired diffusion of macromolecules in that space (low effective diffusivity of MAb); and interactions between specific MAbs and tumor cells. Of these factors, those associated with the parenchymal compartment apparently were rate limiting, and strategies that enhance parenchymal penetration are likely to improve solid tumor therapy with MAbs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1728408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Ron J Keizer; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Effects of cellular pharmacology on drug distribution in tissues.

Authors:  R K Rippley; C L Stokes
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Prodrugs in Cancer Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Richard J Knox; Tom A Connors
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Analysis of the tumor vasculature and metastatic behavior of xenografts of human melanoma cell lines transfected with vascular permeability factor.

Authors:  A J Pötgens; M C van Altena; N H Lubsen; D J Ruiter; R M de Waal
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Biodistribution of a bispecific single-chain diabody and its half-life extended derivatives.

Authors:  Roland Stork; Emmanuelle Campigna; Bruno Robert; Dafne Müller; Roland E Kontermann
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Potential Sources of Inter-Subject Variability in Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Katherine L Gill; Krishna K Machavaram; Rachel H Rose; Manoranjenni Chetty
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Targeting cancer micrometastases with monoclonal antibodies: a binding-site barrier.

Authors:  T Saga; R D Neumann; T Heya; J Sato; S Kinuya; N Le; C H Paik; J N Weinstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Tumor labeling in vivo using cyanine-conjugated monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  B Ballou; G W Fisher; A S Waggoner; D L Farkas; J M Reiland; R Jaffe; R B Mujumdar; S R Mujumdar; T R Hakala
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.968

9.  Elucidation of the tumoritropic principle of hypericin.

Authors:  M Van de Putte; T Roskams; J R Vandenheede; P Agostinis; P A M de Witte
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Technical Note: The development of a multi-physics simulation tool to estimate the background dose by systemic targeted alpha therapy.

Authors:  T Xu; T Liu; G Li; C Dugal; N A Aydemir; Y Liu; J C Roeske
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.071

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.