Literature DB >> 17283436

Detection of gene x gene interactions in genome-wide association studies of human population data.

Solomon K Musani1, Daniel Shriner, Nianjun Liu, Rui Feng, Christopher S Coffey, Nengjun Yi, Hemant K Tiwari, David B Allison.   

Abstract

Empirical evidence supporting the commonality of gene x gene interactions, coupled with frequent failure to replicate results from previous association studies, has prompted statisticians to develop methods to handle this important subject. Nonparametric methods have generated intense interest because of their capacity to handle high-dimensional data. Genome-wide association analysis of large-scale SNP data is challenging mathematically and computationally. In this paper, we describe major issues and questions arising from this challenge, along with methodological implications. Data reduction and pattern recognition methods seem to be the new frontiers in efforts to detect gene x gene interactions comprehensively. Currently, there is no single method that is recognized as the 'best' for detecting, characterizing, and interpreting gene x gene interactions. Instead, a combination of approaches with the aim of balancing their specific strengths may be the optimal approach to investigate gene x gene interactions in human data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17283436     DOI: 10.1159/000099179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  77 in total

1.  The meaning of interaction.

Authors:  Xuefeng Wang; Robert C Elston; Xiaofeng Zhu
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Tests for compositional epistasis under single interaction-parameter models.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Nan M Laird
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 1.670

Review 3.  Statistical analysis of genetic interactions.

Authors:  Nengjun Yi
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  A forest-based approach to identifying gene and gene gene interactions.

Authors:  Xiang Chen; Ching-Ti Liu; Meizhuo Zhang; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Invited commentary: from genome-wide association studies to gene-environment-wide interaction studies--challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Sholom Wacholder
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Comparison of multivariate adaptive regression splines and logistic regression in detecting SNP-SNP interactions and their application in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hui-Yi Lin; Wenquan Wang; Yung-Hsin Liu; Seng-Jaw Soong; Timothy P York; Leann Myers; Jennifer J Hu
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 7.  Prioritizing GWAS results: A review of statistical methods and recommendations for their application.

Authors:  Rita M Cantor; Kenneth Lange; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Adaptive tests for detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Saonli Basu; Xiaotong Shen
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 0.444

9.  A genome-wide gene-gene interaction analysis identifies an epistatic gene pair for lung cancer susceptibility in Han Chinese.

Authors:  Minjie Chu; Ruyang Zhang; Yang Zhao; Chen Wu; Huan Guo; Baosen Zhou; Jiachun Lu; Yongyong Shi; Juncheng Dai; Guangfu Jin; Hongxia Ma; Jing Dong; Yongyue Wei; Cheng Wang; Jianhang Gong; Chongqi Sun; Meng Zhu; Yongyong Qiu; Tangchun Wu; Zhibin Hu; Dongxin Lin; Hongbing Shen; Feng Chen
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 10.  Epistasis--the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems.

Authors:  Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.