Literature DB >> 17283143

Targeted and nontargeted effects of low-dose ionizing radiation on delayed genomic instability in human cells.

Lei Huang1, Perry M Kim, Jac A Nickoloff, William F Morgan.   

Abstract

All humans receive some radiation exposure and the risk for radiation-induced cancer at low doses is based on the assumption that there is a linear non-threshold relationship between dose and subsequent effect. Consequently, risk is extrapolated linearly from high radiation doses to very low doses. However, adaptive responses, bystander effects, and death-inducing effect may influence health effects associated with low-dose radiation exposure. Adaptive response is the phenomenon by which cells irradiated with a sublethal radiation dose can become less susceptible to subsequent high-dose radiation exposure. Bystander effects are nontargeted effects observed in cells that were not irradiated but were either in contact with or received soluble signals from irradiated cells. These non-hit bystander cells can exhibit damage typically associated with direct radiation exposure. Death-inducing effect is a phenomenon whereby medium from human-hamster hybrid cells displaying radiation-induced chromosomal instability is toxic to unirradiated parental cells. In this study, we show that human RKO cells do not exhibit adaptive response, bystander effect, or death-inducing effect, as measured by cell killing, or delayed genomic instability in a stably transfected plasmid-based green fluorescent protein assay measuring homologous recombination and delayed mutation/deletion events. However, growth medium conditioned by some chromosomally unstable RKO derivatives induced genomic instability, indicating that these cells can secrete factor(s) that elicit responses in nonirradiated cells. Furthermore, low radiation doses suppressed the induction of delayed genomic instability by a subsequent high dose, indicative of an adaptive response for radiation-induced genomic instability. These results highlight the inherent variability in cellular responses to low-dose radiation exposure and add to the uncertainties associated with evaluating potential hazards at these low doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17283143     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  27 in total

1.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Radiation-generated short DNA fragments may perturb non-homologous end-joining and induce genomic instability.

Authors:  Dalong Pang; Thomas A Winters; Mira Jung; Shubhadeep Purkayastha; Luciane R Cavalli; Sergey Chasovkikh; Bassem R Haddad; Anatoly Dritschilo
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Micro RNA responses to chronic or acute exposures to low dose ionizing radiation.

Authors:  M Ahmad Chaudhry; Romaica A Omaruddin; Bridget Kreger; Sonia M de Toledo; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  A survivin-associated adaptive response in radiation therapy.

Authors:  David J Grdina; Jeffrey S Murley; Richard C Miller; Helena J Mauceri; Harold G Sutton; Jian Jian Li; Gayle E Woloschak; Ralph R Weichselbaum
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Intraclonal recovery of 'slow clones'-a manifestation of genomic instability: are mitochondria the key to an explanation?

Authors:  Irena Szumiel
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Methyltransferases mediate cell memory of a genotoxic insult.

Authors:  R E Rugo; J T Mutamba; K N Mohan; T Yee; J R Chaillet; J S Greenberger; B P Engelward
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Low- and High-LET Ionizing Radiation Induces Delayed Homologous Recombination that Persists for Two Weeks before Resolving.

Authors:  Christopher P Allen; Hirokazu Hirakawa; Nakako Izumi Nakajima; Sophia Moore; Jingyi Nie; Neelam Sharma; Mayumi Sugiura; Yuko Hoki; Ryoko Araki; Masumi Abe; Ryuichi Okayasu; Akira Fujimori; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 8.  Crosstalk between telomere maintenance and radiation effects: A key player in the process of radiation-induced carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Grace Shim; Michelle Ricoul; William M Hempel; Edouard I Azzam; Laure Sabatier
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.657

9.  Emerging role of radiation induced bystander effects: Cell communications and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Rajamanickam Baskar
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2010-09-12

10.  Oncogenic bystander radiation effects in Patched heterozygous mouse cerebellum.

Authors:  Mariateresa Mancuso; Emanuela Pasquali; Simona Leonardi; Mirella Tanori; Simonetta Rebessi; Vincenzo Di Majo; Simonetta Pazzaglia; Maria Pia Toni; Maria Pimpinella; Vincenzo Covelli; Anna Saran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.