Literature DB >> 17280907

Urinary diversion.

Richard E Hautmann, Hassan Abol-Enein, Khaled Hafez, Isao Haro, Wiking Mansson, Robert D Mills, James D Montie, Arthur I Sagalowsky, John P Stein, Arnulf Stenzl, Urs E Studer, Bjoern G Volkmer.   

Abstract

A consensus conference convened by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Société Internationale d'Urologie (SIU) met to critically review reports of urinary diversion. The world literature on urinary diversion was identified through a Medline search. Evidence-based recommendations for urinary diversion were prepared with reference to a 4-point scale. Many level 3 and 4 citations, but very few level 2 and no level 1, were noted. This outcome supported the clinical practice pattern. Findings of >300 reviewed citations are summarized. Published reports on urinary diversion rely heavily on expert opinion and single-institution retrospective case series: (1) The frequency distribution of urinary diversions performed by the authors of this report in >7000 patients with cystectomy reflects the current status of urinary diversion after cystectomy for bladder cancer: neobladder, 47%; conduit, 33%; anal diversion, 10%; continent cutaneous diversion, 8%; incontinent cutaneous diversion, 2%; and others, 0.1%. (2) No randomized controlled studies have investigated quality of life (QOL) after radical cystectomy. Such studies are desirable but are probably difficult to conduct. Published evidence does not support an advantage of one type of reconstruction over the others with regard to QOL. An important proposed reason for this is that patients are subjected preoperatively to method-to-patient matching, and thus are prepared for disadvantages associated with different methods. (3) Simple end-to-side, freely refluxing ureterointestinal anastomosis to an afferent limb of a low-pressure orthotopic reconstruction, in combination with regular voiding and close follow-up, is the procedure that results in the lowest overall complication rate. The potential benefit of "conventional" antireflux procedures in combination with orthotopic reconstruction seems outweighed by the higher complication and reoperation rates. The need to prevent reflux in a continent cutaneous reservoir is not significantly debated, and this should be done. (4) Most reconstructive surgeons have abandoned the continent Kock ileal reservoir largely because of the significant complication rate associated with the intussuscepted nipple valve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17280907     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  89 in total

Review 1.  Complications associated with urinary diversion.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann; Stefan H Hautmann; Oliver Hautmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Current management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  G Sancho; P Maroto; J Palou
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  [Management of urinary incontinence after orthotopic urinary diversion].

Authors:  A Soave; R Dahlem; M Rink; S Ahyai; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Surgery for recurrent rectal cancer: technical notes and management of complications.

Authors:  A H Mirnezami; P M Sagar
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  The incidence and relevance of prostate cancer in radical cystoprostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  M Alsinnawi; B Loftus; R Flynn; T McDermott; R Grainger; J A Thornhill
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  [Perspectives in urinary diversion].

Authors:  M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Canada's first robotic-assisted totally intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder.

Authors:  Richard L Haddad; Patrick Richard; Franck Bladou
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Updated assessment of neobladder utilization and morbidity according to urinary diversion after radical cystectomy: A contemporary US-population-based cohort.

Authors:  Florian Roghmann; Andreas Becker; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Orchidee Djahangirian; Orchidee Djahagirian; Zhe Tian; Malek Meskawi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Markus Graefen; Pierre Karakiewicz; Joachim Noldus; Maxine Sun
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Urinary diversion--approaches and consequences.

Authors:  Raimund Stein; Markus Hohenfellner; Sascha Pahernik; Stephan Roth; Joachim W Thüroff; Herbert Rübben
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Role of lymphadenectomy for invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Faysal A Yafi; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.