| Literature DB >> 17280604 |
Kevan L Hartshorn1, Mitchell R White, Tesfaldet Tecle, Ida Tornoe, Grith L Sorensen, Erika C Crouch, Uffe Holmskov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surfactant protein D (SP-D) plays important roles in innate host defense against influenza A virus (IAV) infection. Common human polymorphisms of SP-D have been found in many human populations and associated with increased risk of certain infections. We recently reported that the Thr/Thr 11 form of SP-D is associated with low serum levels and assembles predominantly as trimers as opposed to the more common multimeric forms of SP-D.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17280604 PMCID: PMC1797806 DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-8-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Figure 1Effect of mAbs on viral neutralizing and binding activity of SP-D. Three mAbs directed against the CRD of SP-D were tested as indicated. In panel A, a fixed dose of recombinant SP-D multimers (100 ng/ml) was used to neutralize the Phil82 strain of IAV. This concentration of SP-D reduced the number of infectious foci to 4.4 ± 1.2% of control (shown at 0 on the y axis). Neutralization was assessed by fluorescent focus assay and expressed as % of control infectious foci in SP-D treated samples compared to control. Increasing concentrations of the mAbs were pre-incubated with SP-D prior to the neutralization assay. The 246-07 markedly inhibited neutralizing activity (* indicates p < 0.05 vs control). Although 246-04 also inhibited neutralizing activity modestly as indicated its effect was significantly less than 246-07. The 245-01 antibody did not inhibit neutralizing activity but slightly increased neutralization at one concentration (indicated by **). In panel B, the 246-07 and 246-04 mAbs were used to detect SP-D bound to Phil82 IAV by ELISA. Recombinant SP-D multimers were used at 200 ng/ml. Where indicated the antibodies were added after SP-D bound to IAV or added to SP-D prior to adding SP-D to IAV. The 246-07 mAb significantly reduced binding of SP-D when pre-incubated with SP-D prior to addition to the virus (indicated by **). Results are mean ± SEM of 4 experiments.
Effect of mAbs on ability of SP-D to inhibit viral hemagglutination activity
| HA inhibiting conc. of SP-D | 49 ± 14 | 37 ± 11 | 55 ± 17 | >420 |
a Recombinant human SP-D multimers were pre-incubated with the indicated MAbs prior to adding SP-D to virus and assaying HA inhibition.
b The values shown are mean ± SEM (n = 4) amounts of SP-D needed to inhibit 40 HA units of the Phil82 strain of IAV.
Figure 2Natural SP-D multimers bind more strongly to IAV than SP-D trimers. Natural SP-D multimers and trimers were purified from amniotic fluid and tested for binding to Phil82 IAV by ELISA using the 246-04 mAb for detection of bound SP-D. Natural SP-D multimers showed significantly greater binding than trimers (** indicates p < 0.01; n = 3; Panel A). Binding of natural SP-D trimers was significantly above background binding to BSA at 640 ng/ml only (* indicates p < 0.01). In panel B we compared binding of recombinant human trimers and multimers isolated by gel filtration. Again binding of multimers was significantly greater than binding of trimers. In panel B background binding to BSA coated plates was subtracted from the results shown.
Figure 3Natural SP-D multimers cause greater neutralization of IAV than trimers. Neutralization of IAV was assessed as in figure 1. Phil82 IAV was pre-incubated with SP-D at the indicated concentrations prior to infection of MDCK cells. Both SP-D multimers and trimers caused neutralization of IAV (* p < 0.05 compared to control); however, the effect of multimers was significantly greater than trimers (** indicates p < 0.05 compared to control or SP-D trimers). Neutralization by trimers and multimers was also significantly different when analyzed by ANOVA. Results are mean ± SEM of 5 experiments.
Comparison of HA inhibition of IAV strains by SP-D multimers and trimers
| SP-D multimers | 266 ± 47a | 2200 ± 423 | 259 ± 40 |
| SP-D trimers | ≥2062 ± 437 | >2500 | ≥1750 ± 459 |
a HA inhibition was measured using human Type O erythrocytes as described. The results shown are the minimal concentrations of SP-D needed to inhibit 40 HAU of the indicated viral strains (mean ± SEM; n = 3–5 experiments). Where ≥ is shown some of the values were above the maximum concentration of SP-D added (i.e., 2500 ng/ml).
Figure 4Viral neutralization by HNPs alone or in combination with natural SP-D multimers and trimers. Viral neutralization was assessed as in figure 1 and expressed as % of control infectious foci in samples treated with SP-D preparations alone (control; black and gray bars), HNP1 or 2 alone (HNP1 or HNP2; 5 μg/ml; white bars), or combination of HNP1 or 2 with the SP-D preparations (HNP1 or HNP2; black and gray bars; SP-D concentration 350 ng/ml). SP-D multimers caused significantly greater neutralization than trimers as in figure 3 (n = 5; p < 0.01). HNPs 1 and 2 also caused significant neutralization on their own. When SP-D multimers were combined with HNPs a significant increase in neutralization was observed (* indicates significantly different from control or SP-D multimers or HNPs alone by ANOVA).