Literature DB >> 1728017

Pediatric telephone advice in the emergency department: results of a mock scenario.

D J Isaacman1, V P Verdile, F P Kohen, L A Verdile.   

Abstract

To assess the appropriateness of pediatric telephone advice given by emergency departments (EDs), a mock scenario simulating a 5-week-old with fever of 102 degrees F and signs compatible with meningitis was used to evaluate the responses of 61 randomly selected EDs, of which half were affiliated with pediatric residency training programs. All EDs were given the identical chief complaint: "My baby has been having a fever all day, and I can't seem to get it down." Calls were made by research technicians and monitored by one or more of the investigators by speakerphone. Fifty-three (87%) programs gave advice by telephone; in 42 (79%) of the 53 respondents the individual giving advice was a nurse. Fourteen programs (26%) gave advice without asking either the age of the child or height of the fever. Few of the respondents took historical information assessing irritability (4 programs), fluid intake (11 programs), urine output (8 programs), or breathing pattern (6 programs). Thirty-eight (71.7%) EDs advised the patient to see a physician, while only 32 (60.4%) suggested same-day evaluation. In several instances the caller was not advised to seek medical attention despite having given a history documenting the infant's fever, irritability, and lethargy. These findings show variability and inadequacies in pediatric telephone advice currently offered by the EDs that were studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1728017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  10 in total

1.  Telephone medicine for internists.

Authors:  D M Elnicki; P Ogden; M Flannery; M Hannis; S Cykert
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Provision of telephone advice from accident and emergency departments: a national survey.

Authors:  R Crouch; J Dale; B Visavadia; C Higton
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-03

3.  Review of a computer based telephone Helpline in an A&E department.

Authors:  S Srinivas; F Poole; J Redpath; T J Underhill
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1996-09

4.  Parents may know best! A pilot study suggests that children of parents who do not have contact with health care professionals before attending the emergency department are triaged as more urgent.

Authors:  Dennis Scolnik; Kelly Keogh; Amanda Tuffman; Alessandra Palombo; Jonathan Sam; Derek Stephens; Eshetu Atenafu
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Use of a telephone advice line in an accident and emergency department.

Authors:  C V Egleston; H C Kelly; A R Cope
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-01

6.  Audit of telephone advice in a paediatric accident and emergency department.

Authors:  E Molyneux; N Jones; G Aldom; B Molyneux
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1994-12

Review 7.  Safety of telephone triage in out-of-hours care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Linda Huibers; Marleen Smits; Vera Renaud; Paul Giesen; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.581

8.  Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. The South Wiltshire Out of Hours Project (SWOOP) Group.

Authors:  V Lattimer; S George; F Thompson; E Thomas; M Mullee; J Turnbull; H Smith; M Moore; H Bond; A Glasper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-17

Review 9.  Training interventions for improving telephone consultation skills in clinicians.

Authors:  Alberto Vaona; Yannis Pappas; Rumant S Grewal; Mubasshir Ajaz; Azeem Majeed; Josip Car
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-05

10.  Nurse telephone triage in out-of-hours GP practice: determinants of independent advice and return consultation.

Authors:  Eric Peter Moll van Charante; Gerben ter Riet; Sara Drost; Loes van der Linden; Niek S Klazinga; Patrick J E Bindels
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 2.497

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.