Literature DB >> 1727993

Neuroblastoma represents distinct clinical-biologic entities: a review and perspective from the Quebec Neuroblastoma Screening Project.

W G Woods1, B Lemieux, M Tuchman.   

Abstract

Data are presented suggesting that neuroblastoma represents at least two distinct clinical-biologic entities. One, favorable neuroblastoma, is associated with young age and early stage at diagnosis, triploid karyotypes, no 1p abnormalities or N-myc gene amplification, more mature catecholamine synthesis and excretion, and excellent clinical outcome despite no or minimal therapy. The other, unfavorable neuroblastoma, is associated with older age and advanced stage, pseudodiploid karyotypes and 1p deletions, N-myc oncogene amplification, less mature catecholamine synthesis and excretion, and poor outcome despite aggressive multimodality therapy including bone marrow transplantation. Favorable neuroblastomas rarely, if ever, evolve into unfavorable disease. Unresolved issues regarding this hypothesis and implications for the efficacy of preclinical detection through mass screening are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1727993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  6 in total

1.  Immunohistochemical detection of p140trkA and p75LNGFR neurotrophin receptors in neuroblastoma.

Authors:  C Dominici; M R Nicotra; S Alemà; C Bosman; M A Castello; A Donfrancesco; P Gallo; H McDowell; P G Natali
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Disseminated neuroblastomas under 1 year of age: cell biology and prognosis.

Authors:  F Lampert; H Christiansen; F Berner; H J Terpe; F Berthold
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Unusual CNS presentation of neuroblastoma.

Authors:  J C Egelhoff; C Zalles
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1996

Review 4.  The epidemiology of neonatal tumours. Report of an international working group.

Authors:  S W Moore; D Satgé; A J Sasco; A Zimmermann; J Plaschkes
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 5.  Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?

Authors:  J Estève; L Parker; P Roy; F Herrmann; S Duffy; D Frappaz; C Lasset; C Hill; H Sancho-Garnier; J Michaelis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Rapid detection of prognostic genetic factors in neuroblastoma using fluorescence in situ hybridisation on tumour imprints and bone marrow smears. United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  C P Taylor; A G McGuckin; N P Bown; M M Reid; A J Malcolm; A D Pearson; D Sheer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.