Literature DB >> 7779698

Is neuroblastoma screening evaluation needed and feasible?

J Estève1, L Parker, P Roy, F Herrmann, S Duffy, D Frappaz, C Lasset, C Hill, H Sancho-Garnier, J Michaelis.   

Abstract

Despite the five million children who have been screened for neuroblastoma in Japan through detection of catecholamine metabolites, it is still uncertain whether screening for this disease is beneficial. The Japanese study has clearly indicated that screening at 6 months or earlier leads to heavy overdiagnosis. It is shown in this paper that screening at a later age may give the same reduction in mortality with possibly less overdiagnosis. However, it is estimated that, even with two screens at 12 and 18 months, the reduction in mortality would not greatly exceed 25%, under realistic hypotheses on the length of the preclinical phase of the disease. The evaluation of the efficacy of this screening strategy would need the recruitment of half a million children per year over 5-7 years and the follow-up of an equal number of controls. Such a trial would improve our knowledge of the natural history of the disease and might help to answer some questions raised recently regarding its biological heterogeneity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7779698      PMCID: PMC2033839          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  43 in total

1.  Decrease in childhood neuroblastoma death in Japan.

Authors:  Y Hanawa; T Sawada; A Tsunoda
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1990

2.  Cancer statistics, 1990.

Authors:  E Silverberg; C C Boring; T S Squires
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Stage and urinary catecholamine metabolite excretion in neuroblastoma. European Neuroblastoma Study Group.

Authors:  J Pritchard; J Barnes; S Germond; O Hartman; J de Kraker; I Lewis; L Lockwood; K Wallendszus
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Do children benefit from mass screening for neuroblastoma? Consensus Statement from the American Cancer Society Workshop on Neuroblastoma Screening.

Authors:  S B Murphy; S L Cohn; A W Craft; W G Woods; T Sawada; R P Castleberry; H L Levy; P C Prorok; G D Hammond
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-02-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Screening for neuroblastoma at 3 weeks of age: methods and preliminary results from the Quebec Neuroblastoma Screening Project.

Authors:  M Tuchman; B Lemieux; C Auray-Blais; L L Robison; R Giguere; M T McCann; W G Woods
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  A classification scheme for childhood cancer.

Authors:  J M Birch; H B Marsden
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1987-11-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Problems of mass screening for neuroblastoma: analysis of false-negative cases.

Authors:  K Ishimoto; N Kiyokawa; H Fujita; K Yabuta; T Ohya; T Miyano; T Shinohara; Y Sera
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Neuroblastoma--when are urinary catecholamines and their metabolites 'normal'?

Authors:  D J Worthington; E M Hammond; B B Eldeeb; A Green; G M Addison; P H Jones; J R Mann
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.057

9.  Trends in survival for childhood cancer in Britain diagnosed 1971-85.

Authors:  C A Stiller; K J Bunch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  How frequent is spontaneous remission of neuroblastomas? Implications for screening.

Authors:  N L Carlsen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative values of catecholamines and metabolites for the diagnosis of neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Maud Monsaingeon; Yves Perel; Guy Simonnet; Jean-Benoît Corcuff
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Cancer screening trials: nuts and bolts.

Authors:  Philip C Prorok; Pamela M Marcus
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.929

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.