| Literature DB >> 17279619 |
Kathryn A Scott1, Valerie Daggett.
Abstract
The problem of how a protein folds from a linear chain of amino acids to the three-dimensional structure necessary for function is often investigated using proteins with a low degree of sequence identity that adopt different folds. The design of pairs of proteins with a high degree of sequence identity but different folds offers the opportunity for a complementary study; in two highly similar sequences, which residues are the most important in directing folding to a particular structure? Here we use molecular dynamics simulations to characterize the folding-unfolding pathways of a pair of proteins designed by Bryan and co-workers [Alexander, P. A., et al. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 14045-14054; He, Y. N., et al. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 14055-14061]. Despite being 59% identical, the two protein sequences fold to two different structures. The first sequence folds to the alpha+beta protein G structure and the second to the all-alpha-helical protein A structure. We show that the final protein structure is determined early along the folding pathway. In folding to the protein G structure, the single alpha-helix (alpha1) and the beta3-beta4 turn fold early. Formation of the hairpin turn essentially prevents folding to helical structure in this region of the protein. This early structure is then consolidated by formation of long-range hydrophobic interactions between alpha1 and the beta3-beta4 turn. The protein A sequence differs both in the residues that form the beta3-beta4 turn and also in many of the residues that form the early hydrophobic interactions in the protein G structure. Instead, in the protein A sequence, a more hierarchical mechanism is observed, with helices folding before many of the tertiary interactions are formed. We find that small, but critical, sequence differences determine the topology of the protein early along the folding pathway, which help to explain the process by which one fold can evolve into another.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17279619 DOI: 10.1021/bi061904l
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochemistry ISSN: 0006-2960 Impact factor: 3.162