Literature DB >> 17279619

Folding mechanisms of proteins with high sequence identity but different folds.

Kathryn A Scott1, Valerie Daggett.   

Abstract

The problem of how a protein folds from a linear chain of amino acids to the three-dimensional structure necessary for function is often investigated using proteins with a low degree of sequence identity that adopt different folds. The design of pairs of proteins with a high degree of sequence identity but different folds offers the opportunity for a complementary study; in two highly similar sequences, which residues are the most important in directing folding to a particular structure? Here we use molecular dynamics simulations to characterize the folding-unfolding pathways of a pair of proteins designed by Bryan and co-workers [Alexander, P. A., et al. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 14045-14054; He, Y. N., et al. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 14055-14061]. Despite being 59% identical, the two protein sequences fold to two different structures. The first sequence folds to the alpha+beta protein G structure and the second to the all-alpha-helical protein A structure. We show that the final protein structure is determined early along the folding pathway. In folding to the protein G structure, the single alpha-helix (alpha1) and the beta3-beta4 turn fold early. Formation of the hairpin turn essentially prevents folding to helical structure in this region of the protein. This early structure is then consolidated by formation of long-range hydrophobic interactions between alpha1 and the beta3-beta4 turn. The protein A sequence differs both in the residues that form the beta3-beta4 turn and also in many of the residues that form the early hydrophobic interactions in the protein G structure. Instead, in the protein A sequence, a more hierarchical mechanism is observed, with helices folding before many of the tertiary interactions are formed. We find that small, but critical, sequence differences determine the topology of the protein early along the folding pathway, which help to explain the process by which one fold can evolve into another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17279619     DOI: 10.1021/bi061904l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  9 in total

1.  The denatured state dictates the topology of two proteins with almost identical sequence but different native structure and function.

Authors:  Angela Morrone; Michelle E McCully; Philip N Bryan; Maurizio Brunori; Valerie Daggett; Stefano Gianni; Carlo Travaglini-Allocatelli
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Combining experiment and simulation in protein folding: closing the gap for small model systems.

Authors:  R Dustin Schaeffer; Alan Fersht; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Folding simulations of the A and B domains of protein G.

Authors:  Maksim Kouza; Ulrich H E Hansmann
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Shared unfolding pathways of unrelated immunoglobulin-like β-sandwich proteins.

Authors:  Rudesh D Toofanny; Sara Calhoun; Amanda L Jonsson; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 1.650

Review 5.  Immunomodulation for prion and prion-related diseases.

Authors:  Thomas Wisniewski; Fernando Goñi
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.217

6.  Insights from molecular dynamics simulations for computational protein design.

Authors:  Matthew Carter Childers; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Mol Syst Des Eng       Date:  2017-01-09

7.  Better theoretical models and protein design experiments can help to understand protein folding.

Authors:  Konda Mani Saravanan; Samuel Selvaraj
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

8.  A conserved folding nucleus sculpts the free energy landscape of bacterial and archaeal orthologs from a divergent TIM barrel family.

Authors:  Rohit Jain; Khaja Muneeruddin; Jeremy Anderson; Michael J Harms; Scott A Shaffer; C Robert Matthews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Take home lessons from studies of related proteins.

Authors:  Adrian A Nickson; Beth G Wensley; Jane Clarke
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 6.809

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.