Literature DB >> 17278494

Synchronized dynamic dose reconstruction.

Dale W Litzenberg1, Scott W Hadley, Neelam Tyagi, James M Balter, Randall K Ten Haken, Indrin J Chetty.   

Abstract

Variations in target volume position between and during treatment fractions can lead to measurable differences in the dose distribution delivered to each patient. Current methods to estimate the ongoing cumulative delivered dose distribution make idealized assumptions about individual patient motion based on average motions observed in a population of patients. In the delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a multi-leaf collimator (MLC), errors are introduced in both the implementation and delivery processes. In addition, target motion and MLC motion can lead to dosimetric errors from interplay effects. All of these effects may be of clinical importance. Here we present a method to compute delivered dose distributions for each treatment beam and fraction, which explicitly incorporates synchronized real-time patient motion data and real-time fluence and machine configuration data. This synchronized dynamic dose reconstruction method properly accounts for the two primary classes of errors that arise from delivering IMRT with an MLC: (a) Interplay errors between target volume motion and MLC motion, and (b) Implementation errors, such as dropped segments, dose over/under shoot, faulty leaf motors, tongue-and-groove effect, rounded leaf ends, and communications delays. These reconstructed dose fractions can then be combined to produce high-quality determinations of the dose distribution actually received to date, from which individualized adaptive treatment strategies can be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17278494     DOI: 10.1118/1.2388157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion and residual setup error for hypofractionated prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy with online cone beam computed tomography image guidance.

Authors:  Justus Adamson; Qiuwen Wu; Di Yan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Image estimation from marker locations for dose calculation in prostate radiation therapy.

Authors:  Huai-Ping Lee; Mark Foskey; Josh Levy; Rohit Saboo; Ed Chaney
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2010

3.  The use of EPID-measured leaf sequence files for IMRT dose reconstruction in adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Louis Lee; Weihua Mao; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Feasibility study on inverse four-dimensional dose reconstruction using the continuous dose-image of EPID.

Authors:  Inhwan Jason Yeo; Jae Won Jung; Byong Yong Yi; Jong Oh Kim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Dynamically accumulated dose and 4D accumulated dose for moving tumors.

Authors:  Heng Li; Yupeng Li; Xiaodong Zhang; Xiaoqiang Li; Wei Liu; Michael T Gillin; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The dosimetric impact of prostate rotations during electromagnetically guided external-beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hanan Amro; Daniel A Hamstra; Daniel L Mcshan; Howard Sandler; Karen Vineberg; Scott Hadley; Dale Litzenberg
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Assessing the dosimetric impact of real-time prostate motion during volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Juan Diego Azcona; Lei Xing; Xin Chen; Karl Bush; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  A comparison of the dosimetric effects of intrafraction motion on step-and-shoot, compensator, and helical tomotherapy-based IMRT.

Authors:  Ben J Waghorn; Robert J Staton; Justin M Rineer; Sanford L Meeks; Katja Langen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A margin-based analysis of the dosimetric impact of motion on step-and-shoot IMRT lung plans.

Authors:  Benjamin J Waghorn; Amish P Shah; Justin M Rineer; Katja M Langen; Sanford L Meeks
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Comparing measurement-derived (3DVH) and machine log file-derived dose reconstruction methods for VMAT QA in patient geometries.

Authors:  Neelam Tyagi; Kai Yang; Di Yan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.