Literature DB >> 17277914

The "enhanced N35" somatosensory evoked potential: its associations and potential utility in the clinical evaluation of dystonia and myoclonus.

Karl Ng1, Stephen Jones.   

Abstract

In median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials, the cortical N35 amplitude sometimes exceeds the P25 amplitude (C3'/C4' referred to Fz; "enhanced N35" feature). Six hundred consecutive patient median nerve SEPs were retrospectively analysed and compared with 27 controls. The feature was more often present in patients with dystonia (62%) than in patients with other disorders (22%; relative risk for the condition 2.8; Fisher's exact p=0.003) or control subjects (7.4%; odds ratio 20; p=0.0006). Similarly, the feature was more often present in patients with myoclonus (38%) than in patients with other disorders (22%; relative risk 1.7; p=0.02) or control subjects (odds ratio 7.5; p=0.006). There was no clear relationship of the feature to short latency SEP abnormalities except in cases of myoclonus. Further comparison was made of the characteristics of 72 patients each, with and without the feature, whose short latency SEP components were normal. The relationship of the feature to dystonia or myoclonus held true in this case-controlled arm of the study. The sensitivity and specificity were 65% and 78% respectively for any form of dystonia; 43% and 79% respectively for any form of myoclonus. The feature was even more specific in both conditions when compared with controls (93%). Most cases of dystonia with an identifiable cause in this study were of secondary forms. It is known that this feature often occurs in association with "giant" SEPs in some myoclonic conditions. However, its occurrence in dystonia may be a useful new finding in an established test, helping to identify a condition where there is increasing evidence for disordered sensorimotor integration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17277914     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-006-0237-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  14 in total

1.  Abnormal central integration of a dual somatosensory input in dystonia. Evidence for sensory overflow.

Authors:  M Tinazzi; A Priori; L Bertolasi; E Frasson; F Mauguière; A Fiaschi
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Reciprocal inhibition between forearm muscles in patients with writer's cramp and other occupational cramps, symptomatic hemidystonia and hemiparesis due to stroke.

Authors:  K Nakashima; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; K Shannon; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  Psychogenic movement disorders.

Authors:  Anette Schrag; Anthony E Lang
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 4.  A consideration of sensory factors involved in motor functions of the basal ganglia.

Authors:  T I Lidsky; C Manetto; J S Schneider
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  An 'interference" approach to the study of somatosensory evoked potentials in man.

Authors:  S J Jones
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12

6.  Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials. Apomorphine-induced transient potentiation of frontal components in Parkinson's disease and in parkinsonism.

Authors:  P M Rossini; M A Bassetti; P Pasqualetti
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-05

Review 7.  Potentials evoked in human and monkey cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve. A review of scalp and intracranial recordings.

Authors:  T Allison; G McCarthy; C C Wood; S J Jones
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Stereotactic recordings of median nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials in the human pre-supplementary motor area.

Authors:  C Barba; M Frot; M Guénot; F Mauguière
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Pathogenesis of giant somatosensory evoked potentials in progressive myoclonic epilepsy.

Authors:  H Shibasaki; Y Yamashita; R Neshige; S Tobimatsu; R Fukui
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.