Literature DB >> 10611119

Abnormal central integration of a dual somatosensory input in dystonia. Evidence for sensory overflow.

M Tinazzi1, A Priori, L Bertolasi, E Frasson, F Mauguière, A Fiaschi.   

Abstract

Several observations suggest impaired central sensory integration in dystonia. We studied median and ulnar nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in 10 patients who had dystonia involving at least one upper limb (six had generalized, two had segmental and two had focal dystonia) and in 10 normal subjects. We compared the amplitude of spinal N13, brainstem P14, parietal N20 and P27 and frontal N30 SEPs obtained by stimulating the median and ulnar nerves simultaneously (MU), the amplitude value being obtained from the arithmetic sum of the SEPs elicited by stimulating the same nerves separately (M + U). Throughout the somatosensory system, the MU : (M + U) ratio indicates the interaction between afferent inputs from the two peripheral nerves. No significant difference was found between SEP amplitudes and latencies for individually stimulated median and ulnar nerves in dystonic patients and normal subjects, but recordings in patients yielded a significantly higher percentage ratio [MU : (M + U)x100] for spinal N13 brainstem P14 and cortical N20, P27 and N30 components. The SEP ratio of central components obtained in response to stimulation of the digital nerves of the third and fifth fingers was also higher in patients than in controls but the difference did not reach a significant level. The possible contribution of subliminal activation was ruled out by recording the ratio of SEPs in six normal subjects during voluntary contraction. This voluntary contraction did not change the ratio of SEP suppression. These findings suggest that the inhibitory integration of afferent inputs, mainly proprioceptive inputs, coming from adjacent body parts is abnormal in dystonia. This inefficient integration, which is probably due to altered surrounding inhibition, could give rise to an abnormal motor output and might therefore contribute to the motor impairment present in dystonia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10611119     DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.1.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  45 in total

1.  Impaired inhibition of a pre-planned response in focal hand dystonia.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Neurophysiology of dystonia: The role of inhibition.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 3.  Current and emerging strategies for treatment of childhood dystonia.

Authors:  Matteo Bertucco; Terence D Sanger
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 4.  Abnormal sensory gating in basal ganglia disorders.

Authors:  Ryuji Kaji; Ryou Urushihara; Nagako Murase; Hideki Shimazu; Satoshi Goto
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Altered cortical integration of dual somatosensory input following the cessation of a 20 min period of repetitive muscle activity.

Authors:  Heidi Haavik Taylor; B A Murphy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatiotemporal integration of sensory stimuli in complex regional pain syndrome and dystonia.

Authors:  Monique A van Rijn; Jacobus J van Hilten; J Gert van Dijk
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Computational role of large receptive fields in the primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Guglielmo Foffani; John K Chapin; Karen A Moxon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The "enhanced N35" somatosensory evoked potential: its associations and potential utility in the clinical evaluation of dystonia and myoclonus.

Authors:  Karl Ng; Stephen Jones
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Milestones in clinical neurophysiology.

Authors:  Mark Hallett; John Rothwell
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 10.  Task-specific dystonias: a review.

Authors:  Diego Torres-Russotto; Joel S Perlmutter
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.