Literature DB >> 17277236

A population-based association study of SNPs of GSTP1, MnSOD, GPX2 and Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Seamus J Murphy1, Anne E Hughes, Chris C Patterson, Lesley A Anderson, R G Peter Watson, Brian T Johnston, Harry Comber, Jim McGuigan, John V Reynolds, Liam J Murray.   

Abstract

Oxidative stress appears to be important in the pathogenesis of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of antioxidant enzyme genes may play a part in determining individual susceptibility to these diseases. The Factors Influencing the Barrett's Adenocarcinoma Relationship (FINBAR) study is a population-based, case-control study of BE and EAC in Ireland. DNA from EAC (n = 207), BE (> or =3 cm BE at endoscopy with specialized intestinal metaplasia on biopsy, n = 189) and normal population controls (n = 223) were analyzed. Several SNPs spanning the genes for glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1), manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) and glutathione peroxidase 2 (GPX2) were genotyped using multiplex polymerase chain reaction and SNaPshottrade mark. The chi(2) test was used to compare genotype and allele frequencies between case and control subjects. Linkage disequilibrium between SNPs was quantified using Lewontin's D' value and haplotype frequency estimates obtained using Haploview. Eleven SNPs were genotyped (six for GSTP1, three for MnSOD and two for GPX2); all were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. None was significantly associated with EAC or BE even before Bonferroni correction. Odds ratios for EAC for individual SNPs ranged from 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-1.08] to 1.25 (95% CI 0.73-2.16), and for BE from 0.84 (95% CI 0.52-1.30) to 1.30 (95% CI 0.85-1.97). SNPs in all three genes were in strong linkage disequilibrium (D' > 0.887) but haplotype analysis did not show any significant association with EAC or BE. SNPs involving the GSTP1, MnSOD and GPX2 genes were not associated with BE or EAC. Further studies aimed at identifying susceptibility genes should focus on different antioxidant genes or different pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17277236     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgm007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  26 in total

Review 1.  Review: Experimental models for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Katherine S Garman; Roy C Orlando; Xiaoxin Chen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 2.  Barrett esophagus: an update.

Authors:  Rami J Badreddine; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Superoxide dismutase 2 gene and cancer risk: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sang Wook Kang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 4.  Paradoxical Roles of Antioxidant Enzymes: Basic Mechanisms and Health Implications.

Authors:  Xin Gen Lei; Jian-Hong Zhu; Wen-Hsing Cheng; Yongping Bao; Ye-Shih Ho; Amit R Reddi; Arne Holmgren; Elias S J Arnér
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 5.  Surveillance for gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Ashish K Tiwari; Heather S Laird-Fick; Ramesh K Wali; Hemant K Roy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: time for a new synthesis.

Authors:  Brian J Reid; Xiaohong Li; Patricia C Galipeau; Thomas L Vaughan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  Phase I and II enzyme polymorphisms as risk factors for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L M Bull; D L White; M Bray; Z Nurgalieva; H B El-Serag
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 8.  Barrett's oesophagus: an ideal model to study cancer genetics.

Authors:  Massimiliano di Pietro; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Association between glutathione S-transferases P1 Ile105Val polymorphism and susceptibility to esophageal cancer: evidence from 20 case-control studies.

Authors:  Xiang Tan; Mingwu Chen
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 10.  CYP1A1 and GSTP1 gene variations in breast cancer: a systematic review and case-control study.

Authors:  Sumaira Akhtar; Ishrat Mahjabeen; Zertashia Akram; Mahmood Akhtar Kayani
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.