AIMS: Measurement of change in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) has been proposed as an alternative for the occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) events in the assessment of therapeutic interventions. Nevertheless, criticism has been voiced based on observations indicating a weak relation between CIMT and coronary atherosclerosis as well as on the virtual absence of data showing that progression of CIMT indeed predicts coronary artery disease (CAD) and stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: We set out to review the evidence on these issues by performing a literature search on these topics. Of the 34 studies on the relation of CIMT with coronary atherosclerosis, as assessed by angiography (n=33) or intravascular ultrasound (n=1), 30 showed a modest positive relationship; the magnitude of which was similar to that found in autopsy studies. Of all studies on CIMT and future CV events (n=18), 17 showed graded positive relationships. At present, only one study has provided evidence on the relation of change in CIMT and future CV events, showing an increased risk with CIMT progression. The paucity of data on progression and future CV risk is partly attributable to time windows required to complete these studies. CONCLUSION: The modest relation between CIMT and coronary atherosclerosis most likely reflects variability in atherosclerosis development between the vascular beds rather than limitations of CIMT measurements. Additional data on the relation between change in CIMT and future CV events is required and currently is in progress.
AIMS: Measurement of change in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) has been proposed as an alternative for the occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) events in the assessment of therapeutic interventions. Nevertheless, criticism has been voiced based on observations indicating a weak relation between CIMT and coronary atherosclerosis as well as on the virtual absence of data showing that progression of CIMT indeed predicts coronary artery disease (CAD) and stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: We set out to review the evidence on these issues by performing a literature search on these topics. Of the 34 studies on the relation of CIMT with coronary atherosclerosis, as assessed by angiography (n=33) or intravascular ultrasound (n=1), 30 showed a modest positive relationship; the magnitude of which was similar to that found in autopsy studies. Of all studies on CIMT and future CV events (n=18), 17 showed graded positive relationships. At present, only one study has provided evidence on the relation of change in CIMT and future CV events, showing an increased risk with CIMT progression. The paucity of data on progression and future CV risk is partly attributable to time windows required to complete these studies. CONCLUSION: The modest relation between CIMT and coronary atherosclerosis most likely reflects variability in atherosclerosis development between the vascular beds rather than limitations of CIMT measurements. Additional data on the relation between change in CIMT and future CV events is required and currently is in progress.
Authors: Bruce R Reed; Natalie L Marchant; William J Jagust; Charles C DeCarli; Wendy Mack; Helena C Chui Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Luca Saba; Pankaj K Jain; Harman S Suri; Nobutaka Ikeda; Tadashi Araki; Bikesh K Singh; Andrew Nicolaides; Shoaib Shafique; Ajay Gupta; John R Laird; Jasjit S Suri Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2017-05-13 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: R Stolic; A Ilic; A Jovanovic; R Grbic; D Odalovic; Lj Smilic; S Lazic; B Krdzic; J Nedovic Journal: Hippokratia Date: 2015 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 0.471
Authors: Deepa M Gopal; Martin G Larson; James L Januzzi; Susan Cheng; Anahita Ghorbani; Kai C Wollert; Tibor Kempf; Ralph B D'Agostino; Joseph F Polak; Vasan S Ramachandran; Thomas J Wang; Jennifer E Ho Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Fumiaki Imamura; Rozenn N Lemaitre; Irena B King; Xiaoling Song; Alice H Lichtenstein; Nirupa R Matthan; David M Herrington; David S Siscovick; Dariush Mozaffarian Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Jorge Escobedo; Herman Schargrodsky; Beatriz Champagne; Honorio Silva; Carlos P Boissonnet; Raul Vinueza; Marta Torres; Rafael Hernandez; Elinor Wilson Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2009-09-26 Impact factor: 9.951