Literature DB >> 17275426

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for clearance of refractory bile duct stones.

S Amplatz1, L Piazzi, M Felder, M Comberlato, S Benvenuti, L Zancanella, F Di Fede, A de'Guelmi, A Bertozzo, P Farris, T Grasso, A Mega, F Chilovi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Following endoscopic sphincterotomy, 90% of bile duct stones can be removed with a Dormia basket or balloon catheter. The removal can fail in patients with large stones, intrahepatic stones, bile duct strictures or a difficult anatomy. The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in fragmenting and allowing the extraction of bile duct stones that could not be cleared by routine endoscopic means including mechanical lithotripsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1989 to January 2005, we treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 376 patients (133 males and 243 females, median age 71.4 years) with bile duct stones that were not removable following endoscopic sphincterotomy, using the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy Lithostar Plus machine built by Siemens Co. of Erlangen, Germany. Stone targeting was performed fluoroscopically following injection of contrast via nasobiliary drain or T-tube in 362 patients and by ultrasonography in eight patients. Residual fragments were cleared at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograhy. Two hundred and ten of the 370 patients treated (56.7%) showed only 1 stone, 57 (15.4%) showed 2, 45 (12.1%) showed 3, 58 (15.6%) showed more than 3 stones. The median diameter of the stones was 21mm (range 7-80mm).
RESULTS: Complete stone clearance was achieved in 334 of the 376 patients who underwent the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy procedure (90.2%). Six patients (1.5%) dropped out of treatment during their first sessions, mainly because of intolerance. Each patient averaged 3.7 treatments (1-12), at an average rate of 3470 shocks per session (1500-5400), at an average energy level of 3.4mJ (1-7). Complications were recorded in 34 patients (9.1%); 22 patients experienced symptomatic cardiac arrhythmia, 4 haemobilia, 2 cholangitis, 3 haematuria, 3 dyspnoea; no deaths were associated with the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a safe and effective therapy in those patients in whom endoscopic techniques have failed with a clearing rate of 90.2% of refractory bile duct stones with a low rate of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17275426     DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Liver Dis        ISSN: 1590-8658            Impact factor:   4.088


  11 in total

1.  Concept of the pathogenesis and treatment of cholelithiasis.

Authors:  Vasiliy Ivanovich Reshetnyak
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2012-02-27

Review 2.  Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Guru Trikudanathan; Udayakumar Navaneethan; Mansour A Parsi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Using cholecystokinin to facilitate endoscopic clearance of large common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Tao Tao; Qi-Jie Zhang; Ming Zhang; Xiao Zhu; Shu-Xia Sun; Yan-Qing Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Surgical treatment of incarcerated calculi via laparoscopic bile duct exploration using laparotomy biliary lithotomy forceps.

Authors:  H Jiang; S Y Wang; X L Jin; J C Jin; H B Gu; F M Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Safety and efficacy of laser lithotripsy for complicated biliary stones using direct choledochoscopy.

Authors:  Bryan G Sauer; Mark Cerefice; Douglas C Swartz; Monica Gaidhane; Animesh Jain; Shahzad Haider; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Permanent stenting in "unextractable" common bile duct stones in high risk patients. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents.

Authors:  Franco Pisello; Girolamo Geraci; Francesco Li Volsi; Giuseppe Modica; Carmelo Sciumè
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  The management of treatment-resistant biliary calculi using percutaneous endourologic techniques.

Authors:  A Andrew Ray; Edward T Davies; Mordechai Duvdevani; Hassan Razvi; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 8.  Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy.

Authors:  Renato Costi; Alessandro Gnocchi; Francesco Di Mario; Leopoldo Sarli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Factors significantly contributing to a failed conventional endoscopic stone clearance in patients with "difficult" choledecholithiasis: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Emmanuel Christoforidis; Konstantinos Vasiliadis; Konstantinos Tsalis; Dimitrios Patridas; Konstantinos Blouhos; Manousos-Georgios Pramateftakis; Moysis Moysidis; Charalampos Lazaridis
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2014-09-30

10.  Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices.

Authors:  Rabindra R Watson; Mansour A Parsi; Harry R Aslanian; Adam J Goodman; David R Lichtenstein; Joshua Melson; Udayakumar Navaneethan; Rahul Pannala; Amrita Sethi; Shelby A Sullivan; Nirav C Thosani; Guru Trikudanathan; Arvind J Trindade; John T Maple
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2018-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.