Literature DB >> 17273926

Exploring associations between physical activity and perceived and objective measures of the built environment.

Aileen P McGinn1, Kelly R Evenson, Amy H Herring, Sara L Huston, Daniel A Rodriguez.   

Abstract

The built environment may be responsible for making nonmotorized transportation inconvenient, resulting in declines in physical activity. However, few studies have assessed both the perceived and objectively measured environment in association with physical activity outcomes. The purpose of this study was to describe the associations between perceptions and objective measures of the built environment and their associations with leisure, walking, and transportation activity. Perception of the environment was assessed from responses to 1,270 telephone surveys conducted in Forsyth County, NC and Jackson, MS from January to July 2003. Participants were asked if high-speed cars, heavy traffic, and lack of crosswalks or sidewalks were problems in their neighborhood or barriers to physical activity. They were also asked if there are places to walk to instead of driving in their neighborhood. Speed, volume, and street connectivity were assessed using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for both study areas. Locations of crashes were measured using GIS for the NC study area as well. Objective and perceived measures of the built environment were in poor agreement as calculated by kappa coefficients. Few associations were found between any of the physical activity outcomes and perception of speed, volume, or presence of sidewalks as problems in the neighborhood or as barriers to physical activity in regression analyses. Associations between perceptions of having places to walk to and presence of crosswalks differed between study sites. Several associations were found between objective measures of traffic volume, traffic speed, and crashes with leisure, walking, and transportation activity in Forsyth County, NC; however, in Jackson, MS, only traffic volume was associated with any of the physical activity outcomes. When both objective and perceived measures of the built environment were combined into the same model, we observed independent associations with physical activity; thus, we feel that evaluating both objective and perceived measures of the built environment may be necessary when examining the relationship between the built environment and physical activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17273926      PMCID: PMC2231636          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-006-9136-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  32 in total

1.  Associations between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community rail-trail.

Authors:  P J Troped; R P Saunders; R R Pate; B Reininger; J R Ureda; S J Thompson
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures.

Authors:  Brian E Saelens; James F Sallis; Lawrence D Frank
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2003

3.  Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment.

Authors:  Billie Giles-Corti; Robert J Donovan
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling.

Authors:  Terri Pikora; Billie Giles-Corti; Fiona Bull; Konrad Jamrozik; Rob Donovan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Environmental measures of physical activity supports: perception versus reality.

Authors:  Karen A Kirtland; Dwayne E Porter; Cheryl L Addy; Matthew J Neet; Joel E Williams; Patricia A Sharpe; Linda J Neff; C Dexter Kimsey; Barbara E Ainsworth
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Neighborhood environment, access to places for activity, and leisure-time physical activity in a diverse North Carolina population.

Authors:  Sara L Huston; Kelly R Evenson; Philip Bors; Ziya Gizlice
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

7.  Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ.

Authors:  Lawrence D Frank; Thomas L Schmid; James F Sallis; James Chapman; Brian E Saelens
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area.

Authors:  Robert Cervero; Michael Duncan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Test-retest reliability of adult surveillance measures for physical activity and inactivity.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Aileen P McGinn
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  The relationship between convenience of destinations and walking levels in older women.

Authors:  Wendy C King; Jennifer S Brach; Steven Belle; Richard Killingsworth; Mark Fenton; Andrea M Kriska
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct
View more
  102 in total

1.  Walking and cycling to health: a comparative analysis of city, state, and international data.

Authors:  John Pucher; Ralph Buehler; David R Bassett; Andrew L Dannenberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The Census of Social Institutions (CSI): a public health direct observation measure of local land use.

Authors:  Katie M Heinrich; Joseph Hughey; Anthony Randles; Dustin Wall; N Andrew Peterson; Nattinee Jitnarin; LaVerne Berkel; Peter Eaton; Doug Bowles; C Keith Haddock; W S Carlos Poston
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Neighborhood Eating and Activity Advocacy Teams (NEAAT): engaging older adults in policy activities to improve food and physical environments.

Authors:  Matthew P Buman; Sandra J Winter; Cathleen Baker; Eric B Hekler; Jennifer J Otten; Abby C King
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Measuring Physical Activity in Outdoor Community Recreational Environments: Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice.

Authors:  Semra A Aytur; Sydney A Jones; Michelle Stransky; Kelly R Evenson
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep       Date:  2015-01

5.  Individual, social environmental and physical environmental barriers to achieving 10 000 steps per day among older women.

Authors:  Katherine S Hall; Edward McAuley
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2010-03-26

6.  Piloting a 'spatial isolation' index: the built environment and sexual and drug use risks to sex workers.

Authors:  Kathleen N Deering; Melanie Rusch; Ofer Amram; Jill Chettiar; Paul Nguyen; Cindy X Feng; Kate Shannon
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2013-12-22

7.  The Stanford Healthy Neighborhood Discovery Tool: a computerized tool to assess active living environments.

Authors:  Matthew P Buman; Sandra J Winter; Jylana L Sheats; Eric B Hekler; Jennifer J Otten; Lauren A Grieco; Abby C King
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Social determinants and osteoarthritis outcomes.

Authors:  My-Linh N Luong; Rebecca J Cleveland; Kirsten A Nyrop; Leigh F Callahan
Journal:  Aging health       Date:  2012-08-01

9.  Predictors of discordance between perceived and objective neighborhood data.

Authors:  Erin J Bailey; Kristen C Malecki; Corinne D Engelman; Matthew C Walsh; Andrew J Bersch; Ana P Martinez-Donate; Paul E Peppard; F Javier Nieto
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Objective and perceived availability of physical activity opportunities: differences in associations with physical activity behavior among urban adolescents.

Authors:  Richard G Prins; Anke Oenema; Klazine van der Horst; Johannes Brug
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.