Katherine S Hall1, Edward McAuley. 1. Geriatric Research, Education,.linical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 508 Fulton Street, GRECC 182, Durham, NC 27705, USA. Katherine.hall3@va.gov
Abstract
UNLABELLED: This study examined the determinants of attaining/not attaining 10 000 steps per day among older women. METHODS: Daily step counts over 7 days were measured using accelerometry. Self-reported environmental characteristics, self-efficacy, social support and functional limitations were assessed in 128 older women. The presence of areas for activity within 1 km of each participant's residence was assessed using Geographic Information Systems. Multivariate analysis of variances were used to examine the degree to which these groups differed on measured constructs, and discriminant analysis was used to determine the profiles that discriminate among those who did not attain 10 000 steps per day and those who did. RESULTS: Participants who did not attain 10 000 steps per day reported lower self-efficacy (P < 0.05), greater functional limitations (P < 0.05), had significantly fewer walking paths (P < 0.05) within 1 km of their home and reported significantly less street connectivity (P < 0.05) and safety from traffic (P < 0.05) than those who achieved 10 000 steps per day. CONCLUSION: Lack of perceived and actual environmental supports for walking, more functional limitations and lower self-efficacy are barriers to achieving 10 000 steps per day. The absence of these individual and environmental characteristics inhibits walking behavior in older women and should be considered in campaigns to promote a physically active lifestyle.
UNLABELLED: This study examined the determinants of attaining/not attaining 10 000 steps per day among older women. METHODS: Daily step counts over 7 days were measured using accelerometry. Self-reported environmental characteristics, self-efficacy, social support and functional limitations were assessed in 128 older women. The presence of areas for activity within 1 km of each participant's residence was assessed using Geographic Information Systems. Multivariate analysis of variances were used to examine the degree to which these groups differed on measured constructs, and discriminant analysis was used to determine the profiles that discriminate among those who did not attain 10 000 steps per day and those who did. RESULTS:Participants who did not attain 10 000 steps per day reported lower self-efficacy (P < 0.05), greater functional limitations (P < 0.05), had significantly fewer walking paths (P < 0.05) within 1 km of their home and reported significantly less street connectivity (P < 0.05) and safety from traffic (P < 0.05) than those who achieved 10 000 steps per day. CONCLUSION: Lack of perceived and actual environmental supports for walking, more functional limitations and lower self-efficacy are barriers to achieving 10 000 steps per day. The absence of these individual and environmental characteristics inhibits walking behavior in older women and should be considered in campaigns to promote a physically active lifestyle.
Authors: Amy A Eyler; Dyann Matson-Koffman; Deborah Rohm Young; Sara Wilcox; JoEllen Wilbur; Janice L Thompson; Bonnie Sanderson; Kelly R Evenson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Linda Trinh; Kristian Larsen; Guy E Faulkner; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Ryan E Rhodes; Scott North; Kerry S Courneya Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-06-06 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Andrea L Rosso; Tony H Grubesic; Amy H Auchincloss; Loni P Tabb; Yvonne L Michael Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Nancy A Gallagher; Philippa J Clarke; David L Ronis; Carol Loveland Cherry; Linda Nyquist; Kimberlee A Gretebeck Journal: Res Gerontol Nurs Date: 2012-09-17 Impact factor: 1.571
Authors: João Paulo Barbosa; Breno Quintella Farah; Marcel Chehuen; Gabriel Grizzo Cucato; José Cazuza Farias Júnior; Nelson Wolosker; Cláudia Lúcia Forjaz; Andrew W Gardner; Raphael Mendes Ritti-Dias Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2015-02
Authors: Lilah M Besser; Daniel A Rodriguez; Noreen McDonald; Walter A Kukull; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Stephen R Rapp; Teresa Seeman Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Michael Todd; Marc A Adams; Jonathan Kurka; Terry L Conway; Kelli L Cain; Matthew P Buman; Lawrence D Frank; James F Sallis; Abby C King Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Bjørge Herman Hansen; Yngvar Ommundsen; Ingar Holme; Elin Kolle; Sigmund Alfred Anderssen Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2013-04-26 Impact factor: 3.380