Literature DB >> 17273212

Apgar Scores: Examining the Long-term Significance.

K S Montgomery1.   

Abstract

The Apgar scoring system was intended as an evaluative measure of a newborn's condition at birth and of the need for immediate attention. In the most recent past, individuals have unsuccessfully attempted to link Apgar scores with long-term developmental outcomes. This practice is not appropriate, as the Apgar score is currently defined. Expectant parents need to be aware of the limitations of the Apgar score and its appropriate uses.

Year:  2000        PMID： 17273212      PMCID： PMC1595023          DOI： 10.1624/105812400X87716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Educ        ISSN： 1058-1243


  18 in total

1.  Understanding the Apgar score.

Authors:  M D Letko
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  1996-05

2.  Neurological findings in neonates with low Apgar in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  M J Wolf; G Beunen; P Casaer; B Wolf
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Predictive value of Apgar scores for developmental outcome in premature infants.

Authors:  M Behnke; F D Eyler; R L Carter; N S Hardt; A C Cruz; M B Resnick
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Neonatal neurological examination as a predictor of neuromotor outcome at 4 months in term low-Apgar-score babies in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  M J Wolf; G Beunen; P Casaer; B Wolf
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  1998-05-29       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  The inaccuracy of Apgar scoring.

Authors:  D A Clark; D O Hakanson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  The newborn (Apgar) scoring system. Reflections and advice.

Authors:  V Apgar
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 3.278

Review 7.  The Apgar score: evolution, limitations, and scoring guidelines.

Authors:  H A Jepson; M L Talashek; A M Tichy
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.689

8.  Transient dystonia in non-handicapped low-birthweight infants and later neurodevelopment.

Authors:  K Sommerfelt; S Pedersen; B Ellertsen; T Markestad
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.299

9.  [Fetal acidemia and neonatal encephalopathy].

Authors:  A Riehn; C Petzold; E Kuhlisch; W Distler
Journal:  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 0.685

10.  The value of Apgar scores in predicting developmental outcome at age five.

Authors:  J A Blackman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.521
View more
  10 in total

1.  Safety of English ivy (Hedera helix) leaf extract during pregnancy: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Abdullah Alkattan; Raad Alameer; Eman Alsalameen; Maram Almaary; Mansour Alkhairat; Ahmed Alkhalifah; Fatimah Alghanim; Nashwa Radwan
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 4.088

2.  Maternal arsenic exposure, arsenic methylation efficiency, and birth outcomes in the Biomarkers of Exposure to ARsenic (BEAR) pregnancy cohort in Mexico.

Authors:  Jessica E Laine; Kathryn A Bailey; Marisela Rubio-Andrade; Andrew F Olshan; Lisa Smeester; Zuzana Drobná; Amy H Herring; Miroslav Stýblo; Gonzalo G García-Vargas; Rebecca C Fry
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Creating exclusive breastfeeding knowledge translation tools with First Nations mothers in Northwest Territories, Canada.

Authors:  Pertice Moffitt; Raissa Dickinson
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 1.228

4.  Is the Salut Programme an effective and cost-effective universal health promotion intervention for parents and their children? A register-based retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jenny Häggström; Filipa Sampaio; Eva Eurenius; Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström; Anneli Ivarsson; Marie Lindkvist; Inna Feldman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Etiology, clinical findings and laboratory parameters in neonates with acute bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  Hassan Boskabadi; Elahe Heidari; Maryam Zakerihamidi
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2020-04

6.  Prediction of low Apgar score at five minutes following labor induction intervention in vaginal deliveries: machine learning approach for imbalanced data at a tertiary hospital in North Tanzania.

Authors:  Clifford Silver Tarimo; Soumitra S Bhuyan; Yizhen Zhao; Weicun Ren; Akram Mohammed; Quanman Li; Marilyn Gardner; Michael Johnson Mahande; Yuhui Wang; Jian Wu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Comparison of mortality and survival without major morbidities of very preterm infants with very low birth weight from Japan and Brazil.

Authors:  Caroline Kaori Tomo; Olukunmi Omobolanle Balogun; Josy Davidson; Ruth Guinsburg; Maria Fernanda Branco de Almeida; José Maria de Andrade Lopes; Marina Carvalho de Moraes Barros; Kenji Takehara; Masashi Mikami; Tetsuya Isayama; Ai Hoshino; Rintaro Mori; Masashi Mizuguchi
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-09

8.  The Correlation of Cord Arterial Blood Gas Analysis Results and Apgar Scores in Term Infants Without Fetal Distress.

Authors:  Aslan Yılmaz; Nesrin Kaya; İpek Ülkersoy; Hasan Emir Taner; Hazal Cansu Acar; Didem Kaymak; Yıldız Perk; Mehmet Vural
Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr       Date:  2022-09

9.  Relationship between Apgar scores and long-term cognitive outcomes in individuals with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Laura Del Hoyo Soriano; Tracie C Rosser; Debra R Hamilton; Danielle J Harvey; Leonard Abbeduto; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Cryopreserved embryo replacement is associated with higher birthweight compared with fresh embryo: multicentric sibling embryo cohort study.

Authors:  Margaux Anav; Simon Phillips; Alice Ferrieres-Hoa; Anna Gala; Alice Fournier; Claire Vincens; Emmanuelle Vintejoux; Elsa Maris; Camille Grysole; François Bissonnette; Sophie Brouillet; Isaac Jacques Kadoch; Samir Hamamah
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.