Literature DB >> 1718292

The Apgar score: evolution, limitations, and scoring guidelines.

H A Jepson, M L Talashek, A M Tichy.   

Abstract

The Apgar score has been useful for nearly four decades in focusing on five physiological signs (heart rate, respiratory effort, reflex irritability, muscle tone, color) that denote the condition of an infant during the first critical minutes of life. Before the development of the system, narcotic analgesia and sedation during labor, and general anesthesia for vaginal deliveries were commonly used. Research of the scoring method has focused on the effects of these interventions on the fetus and newborn and has been a major impetus for change in obstetric practices. The Apgar score has been used as a predictive index for neonatal mortality and morbidity and for later neurologic or developmental disability. Both the one- and five-minute scores are predictors of mortality in normal-birthweight infants, whereas in high-risk low-birthweight infants their score is limited. The score is an insensitive predictive index of long-term neurologic or mental handicap, and lacks both sensitivity and specificity to reflect accurately the degree of acidosis. It can be used effectively, however, if these limitations are understood and considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1718292     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1991.tb00065.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  12 in total

1.  Performance profile of an outcome measure: morbidity assessment index for newborns.

Authors:  Anila Verma; Angela Weir; Jane Drummond; Bryan F Mitchell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Apgar Scores: Examining the Long-term Significance.

Authors:  K S Montgomery
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2000

3.  Utility of the 5-Minute Apgar Score as a Research Endpoint.

Authors:  Marit L Bovbjerg; Mekhala V Dissanayake; Melissa Cheyney; Jennifer Brown; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Incidence and risk factors of pressure ulcers in seven neonatal intensive care units in Japan: a multisite prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kumiko Fujii; Junko Sugama; Mayumi Okuwa; Hiromi Sanada; Yuko Mizokami
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Neonatal complications in public and private patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Sarah Stock; Fatima Haggar; Geoffrey Hammond; Amanda T Langridge; David B Preen; Nick De Klerk; Helen Leonard; Fiona J Stanley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Is the Salut Programme an effective and cost-effective universal health promotion intervention for parents and their children? A register-based retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jenny Häggström; Filipa Sampaio; Eva Eurenius; Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brännström; Anneli Ivarsson; Marie Lindkvist; Inna Feldman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Neonatal outcomes after preterm birth by mothers' health insurance status at birth: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Fatima A Haggar; Amanda T Langridge; Anthony S Gunnell; Helen Leonard; Fiona J Stanley
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Comparison of the Effects of Maternal Supportive Care and Acupressure (at BL32 Acupoint) on Labor Length and Infant's Apgar Score.

Authors:  Marzieh Akbarzadeh; Zahra Masoudi; Najaf Zare; Maryam Kasraeian
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-08-19

9.  Evaluation of a Comprehensive Delivery Room Neonatal Resuscitation and Adaptation Score (NRAS) Compared to the Apgar Score: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Shadi R Jurdi; Archana Jayaram; Adam P Sima; Karen D Hendricks Muñoz
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2015-07-31

Review 10.  Cerebral Tissue Oxygenation during Immediate Neonatal Transition and Resuscitation.

Authors:  Gerhard Pichler; Georg M Schmölzer; Berndt Urlesberger
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.