Literature DB >> 1727283

Chronic wrist pain: spin-echo and short tau inversion recovery MR imaging and conventional and MR arthrography.

M E Schweitzer1, S K Brahme, J Hodler, G J Hanker, T P Lynch, B D Flannigan, C A Godzik, D Resnick.   

Abstract

The accuracy of T1-, proton-density-, and T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences and gadolinium-enhanced MR arthrography in evaluation of the triangular fibro-cartilage complex (TFCC) and the scapholunate (SL) and lunotriquetral (LT) ligaments was studied in 15 patients with chronic wrist pain. Arthrography and arthroscopy were used as standards of reference. Twelve patients also underwent imaging with short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. MR imaging was more reliable in evaluation of the morphology of the TFCC and SL ligament than in that of the LT ligament. With arthrography as the standard, sensitivity was 0.721, specificity was 0.947, and accuracy was 0.887 for the TFCC; these values were 0.500, 0.864, and 0.765 for the SL ligament and 0.519, 0.455, and 0.490 for the LT ligament. No visualization of the SL ligament indicated a tear, but this sign was not helpful in evaluation of the LT ligament. Fluid in the distal radioulnar joint had a high association with TFCC tears. Accuracy with MR arthrography was higher than with the other sequences. STIR images were effective in evaluation of the TFCC. The combination of proton-density-and T2-weighted images appears to be useful because morphologic characteristics and the presence of fluid can be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1727283     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.182.1.1727283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  27 in total

1.  [Diagnostics at the wrist].

Authors:  R Meier; C Krettek; H Krimmer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Direct magnetic resonance arthrography.

Authors:  Dmitry Elentuck; William E Palmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Radiological procedures in the traumatised wrist].

Authors:  R Meier; H Jansen; M Uhl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Accuracy of direct magnetic resonance arthrography in the diagnosis of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears of the wrist.

Authors:  Suraj Joshy; Subhajit Ghosh; Kenneth Lee; Subodh C Deshmukh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Radiological procedures in the traumatised wrist].

Authors:  R Meier; H Jansen; M Uhl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Intrinsic ligament and triangular fibrocartilage complex tears of the wrist: comparison of MDCT arthrography, conventional 3-T MRI, and MR arthrography.

Authors:  Ryan K L Lee; Alex W H Ng; Cina S L Tong; James F Griffith; W L Tse; C Wong; P C Ho
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The role of wrist magnetic resonance arthrography in diagnosing triangular fibrocartilage complex tears: experience at king hussein medical center, jordan.

Authors:  Asem A Al-Hiari
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2013-05-09

8.  Depiction of the triangular fibro-cartilage in patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain: comparison of direct multi-slice CT arthrography and direct MR arthrography.

Authors:  Georg Omlor; Martin Jung; Thomas Grieser; Karl Ludwig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  High-resolution MR imaging of the proximal zone of the lunotriquetral ligament with a microscopy coil.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yoshioka; Toshikazu Tanaka; Teruko Ueno; Masashi Shindo; John A Carrino; Philipp Lang; Carl S Winalski
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Ulnar-sided wrist pain. II. Clinical imaging and treatment.

Authors:  Atsuya Watanabe; Felipe Souza; Peter S Vezeridis; Philip Blazar; Hiroshi Yoshioka
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.