OBJECTIVE: To evaluate high-resolution MRI of the proximal zone of the lunotriquetral ligament (LTL) using a microscopy surface coil with a 1.5 T scanner. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: The proximal zone of the LTL was reviewed in 90 subjects (23 asymptomatic normal volunteers and 67 patients with suspicion of triangular fibrocartilage complex injury) with high-resolution MRI using a 47-mm microscopy surface coil. High-resolution MR images were obtained with gradient recalled echo (GRE) T2*-weighted sequence and short tau inversion recovery imaging, with a 1- to 1.5-mm slice thickness, a 50-mm field of view, an imaging matrix of 140-224x512 using zero fill interpolation, and 3-4 excitations. As a qualitative analysis, the LTL was classified in shape and signal intensity. RESULTS: The triangle-shaped low-signal-intensity LTL was identified in 77 of 90 subjects (85.6%) on GRE images. The triangle was classified as regular (41.1%), broad-based (20.0%), narrow-based (6.7%), or asymmetrical (17.8%). The bar-shaped ligament was seen in one patient, and unclassified ligaments were seen in 12 patients. All volunteers showed triangle-shaped LTL. The MR signal intensity of the proximal zone in the LTL was characterized as homogeneously low intensity (type 1; 33.8%), linear intermediate or high signal intensity traversing the distal surface of the LTL (type 2; 45.5%), and linear intermediate or high intensity traversing both distal and proximal surfaces of LTL (type 3; 20.8%). CONCLUSION: The proximal zone of the LTL showed a broad spectrum of normal variations in shape and signal intensity on high-resolution MR images with a microscopy coil.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate high-resolution MRI of the proximal zone of the lunotriquetral ligament (LTL) using a microscopy surface coil with a 1.5 T scanner. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: The proximal zone of the LTL was reviewed in 90 subjects (23 asymptomatic normal volunteers and 67 patients with suspicion of triangular fibrocartilage complex injury) with high-resolution MRI using a 47-mm microscopy surface coil. High-resolution MR images were obtained with gradient recalled echo (GRE) T2*-weighted sequence and short tau inversion recovery imaging, with a 1- to 1.5-mm slice thickness, a 50-mm field of view, an imaging matrix of 140-224x512 using zero fill interpolation, and 3-4 excitations. As a qualitative analysis, the LTL was classified in shape and signal intensity. RESULTS: The triangle-shaped low-signal-intensity LTL was identified in 77 of 90 subjects (85.6%) on GRE images. The triangle was classified as regular (41.1%), broad-based (20.0%), narrow-based (6.7%), or asymmetrical (17.8%). The bar-shaped ligament was seen in one patient, and unclassified ligaments were seen in 12 patients. All volunteers showed triangle-shaped LTL. The MR signal intensity of the proximal zone in the LTL was characterized as homogeneously low intensity (type 1; 33.8%), linear intermediate or high signal intensity traversing the distal surface of the LTL (type 2; 45.5%), and linear intermediate or high intensity traversing both distal and proximal surfaces of LTL (type 3; 20.8%). CONCLUSION: The proximal zone of the LTL showed a broad spectrum of normal variations in shape and signal intensity on high-resolution MR images with a microscopy coil.
Authors: G L Manton; M E Schweitzer; D Weishaupt; W B Morrison; A L Osterman; R W Culp; N Shabshin Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2001 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Andrew H Haims; Mark E Schweitzer; William B Morrison; Diane Deely; Robert C Lange; A Lee Osterman; John M Bednar; John S Taras; Randall W Culp Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J M Ahn; R R Brown; S M Kwak; H S Kang; C Muhle; M J Botte; D Trudell; P Haghighi; D Resnick Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: H G Potter; L Asnis-Ernberg; A J Weiland; R N Hotchkiss; M G Peterson; R R McCormack Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Ryan K L Lee; Alex W H Ng; Cina S L Tong; James F Griffith; W L Tse; C Wong; P C Ho Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 2.199