Literature DB >> 17272630

Noninitiation or withdrawal of intensive care for high-risk newborns.

Edward F Bell.   

Abstract

Advances in medical technology have led to dilemmas in initiation and withdrawal of intensive care of newborn infants with a very poor prognosis. Physicians and parents together must make difficult decisions guided by their understanding of the child's best interest. The foundation for these decisions consists of several key elements: (1) direct and open communication between the health care team and the parents of the child with regard to the medical status, prognosis, and treatment options; (2) inclusion of the parents as active participants in the decision process; (3) continuation of comfort care even when intensive care is not being provided; and (4) treatment decisions that are guided primarily by the best interest of the child.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17272630     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-3180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  45 in total

1.  The end at the beginning.

Authors:  Michael White
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2011

2.  Research governance and change in research ethics practices at a major Australian university.

Authors:  Yordanka Krastev; Michael Grimm; Andrew Metcalfe
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2011-09

3.  Letters to the editor.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

4.  Characterization of health care provider attitudes toward parental involvement in neonatal resuscitation-related decision making in Mongolia.

Authors:  Ryan M McAdams; Ronald J McPherson; Maneesh Batra; Zagd Gerelmaa
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-05

Review 5.  Parental refusal of medical treatment for a newborn.

Authors:  John J Paris; Michael D Schreiber; Michael P Moreland
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2007

6.  Development of a Test of Residents' Ethics Knowledge for Pediatrics (TREK-P).

Authors:  Jennifer C Kesselheim; Graham T McMahon; Steven Joffe
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-06

Review 7.  Advocating for equality for preterm infants.

Authors:  Daniel Batton; Beau Batton
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Perinatal network consensus guidelines on the resuscitation of extremely preterm infants born at <27 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Ujwal Kariholu; Sunit Godambe; Richa Ajitsaria; Michele Cruwys; Ezam Mat-Ali; Nour Elhadi; Alexandra Mancini; Merran Thomson
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  Survival of extremely premature babies in a geographically defined population: prospective cohort study of 1994-9 compared with 2000-5.

Authors:  David J Field; Jon S Dorling; Bradley N Manktelow; Elizabeth S Draper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-09

10.  Perinatal factors associated with active intensive treatment at the border of viability: a population-based study.

Authors:  I Litmanovitz; B Reichman; S Arnon; V Boyko; L Lerner-Geva; S Bauer-Rusak; T Dolfin
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.