OBJECTIVES: To establish the frequency of executive dysfunction during acute hospitalization for stroke and to examine the relationship of that dysfunction to stroke severity and premorbid characteristics. DESIGN: Inception cohort study. SETTING: Inpatient wards at a Veterans Affairs hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of inpatients with radiologically or neurologically confirmed stroke. Final sample included 47 patients screened for aphasia and capable of neuropsychologic testing. Two nonstroke inpatient control samples (n=10 each) with either transient ischemic attack (TIA) or multiple stroke risk factors were administered the same research procedure and tests. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite cognitive impairment ratio (CIR), calculated from 8 scores indicative of executive function on 6 neuropsychologic tests by dividing number of tests completed into the number of scores falling below cutoff point, defined as 1.5 standard deviations below normative population mean. RESULTS: Stroke patients had a mean CIR of .61, compared with .48 for TIAs and .44 for stroke-risk-only. Analysis of variance revealed that CIRs of stroke-risk-only patients but not TIAs were lower than those of the stroke patients (P=.02). Impairment frequencies were at least 50% for stroke patients on most test scores. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (75% impairment) and a design fluency measure distinguished stroke from nonstroke patients. CIR was not related to stroke severity in the stroke patient sample, but was related to estimated premorbid intelligence. CONCLUSIONS: Executive function deficits are common in stroke patients. The data suggest that limitations in information processing due to these deficits may require environmental and procedural accommodations to increase rehabilitation benefit.
OBJECTIVES: To establish the frequency of executive dysfunction during acute hospitalization for stroke and to examine the relationship of that dysfunction to stroke severity and premorbid characteristics. DESIGN: Inception cohort study. SETTING: Inpatient wards at a Veterans Affairs hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of inpatients with radiologically or neurologically confirmed stroke. Final sample included 47 patients screened for aphasia and capable of neuropsychologic testing. Two nonstroke inpatient control samples (n=10 each) with either transient ischemic attack (TIA) or multiple stroke risk factors were administered the same research procedure and tests. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite cognitive impairment ratio (CIR), calculated from 8 scores indicative of executive function on 6 neuropsychologic tests by dividing number of tests completed into the number of scores falling below cutoff point, defined as 1.5 standard deviations below normative population mean. RESULTS:Strokepatients had a mean CIR of .61, compared with .48 for TIAs and .44 for stroke-risk-only. Analysis of variance revealed that CIRs of stroke-risk-only patients but not TIAs were lower than those of the strokepatients (P=.02). Impairment frequencies were at least 50% for strokepatients on most test scores. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (75% impairment) and a design fluency measure distinguished stroke from nonstroke patients. CIR was not related to stroke severity in the strokepatient sample, but was related to estimated premorbid intelligence. CONCLUSIONS: Executive function deficits are common in strokepatients. The data suggest that limitations in information processing due to these deficits may require environmental and procedural accommodations to increase rehabilitation benefit.
Authors: Neco X Johnson; Maria J Marquine; Ilse Flores; Anya Umlauf; Carolyn M Baum; Alex W K Wong; Alexis C Young; Jennifer J Manly; Allen W Heinemann; Susan Magasi; Robert K Heaton Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Arvind Nishtala; Ryan J Piers; Jayandra J Himali; Alexa S Beiser; Kendra L Davis-Plourde; Jane S Saczynski; David D McManus; Emelia J Benjamin; Rhoda Au Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Elizabeth R Skidmore; Meryl Butters; Ellen Whyte; Emily Grattan; Jennifer Shen; Lauren Terhorst Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 3.966