Literature DB >> 17270240

Feasibility and diagnostic agreement in teledermatopathology using a virtual slide system.

Cesare Massone1, H Peter Soyer, Gian Piero Lozzi, Alessandro Di Stefani, Bernd Leinweber, Gerald Gabler, Masoud Asgari, Renata Boldrini, Leonardo Bugatti, Vincenzo Canzonieri, Gerardo Ferrara, Kazuo Kodama, Darius Mehregan, Franco Rongioletti, Shahbaz A Janjua, Vahid Mashayekhi, Ismini Vassilaki, Bernhard Zelger, Borut Zgavec, Lorenzo Cerroni, Helmut Kerl.   

Abstract

We investigated the feasibility and diagnostic agreement of a virtual slide system (VSS) in teledermatopathology. Forty-six biopsy specimens from inflammatory skin diseases were selected and scanned with a VSS at the Research Unit of Teledermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. Images were stored on a virtual slide server on which a specific Web application suited for telepathology (http://telederm.org/research/dermatopath/) runs. Twelve teleconsultants from 6 different countries reviewed the 46 cases, working directly on the Web application. Telediagnoses agreed with gold standard and conventional diagnosis with an average of 73% and 74%, respectively. Complete concordance among all teleconsultants with gold standard and conventional diagnosis was found in 20% of the cases. In 10 cases in which complete clinical data were missing, the average agreement of telediagnosis with gold standard diagnosis and conventional diagnosis decreased to 65% and 66%, respectively. Only 3 of 4 cases of inflammatory skin diseases were correctly diagnosed remotely with VSS. The system that we have used, despite its usability, is not completely feasible for teledermatopathology of inflammatory skin disease. Moreover, the performance seems to have been influenced by the availability of complete clinical data and by the intrinsic difficulty of the pathology of inflammatory skin diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17270240     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  15 in total

1.  A web-based solution for viewing large-sized microscopic images.

Authors:  Chung-Yueh Lien; Hsu-Chih Teng; Deng-Ji Chen; Woei-Chyn Chu; Chia-Hung Hsiao
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Evolution of the liver biopsy and its future.

Authors:  Dhanpat Jain; Richard Torres; Romulo Celli; Jeremy Koelmel; Georgia Charkoftaki; Vasilis Vasiliou
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 3.  The Empirical Foundations of Telepathology: Evidence of Feasibility and Intermediate Effects.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Ronald S Weinstein; Matthew R Dunn; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Teledentistry: distant diagnosis of oral disease using e-mails.

Authors:  Cassius C Torres-Pereira; Imara de Almeida Castro Morosini; Renata Seleme Possebon; Allan Fernando Giovanini; Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi; Jair Carneiro Leão; Cleto Mariosvaldo Piazzetta
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.536

5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Virtual Pathology vs Traditional Microscopy in a Large Dermatopathology Study.

Authors:  Michael N Kent; Thomas G Olsen; Theresa A Feeser; Katherine C Tesno; John C Moad; Michael P Conroy; Mary Jo Kendrick; Sean R Stephenson; Michael R Murchland; Ayesha U Khan; Elizabeth A Peacock; Alexa Brumfiel; Michael A Bottomley
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 10.282

6.  A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Nancy Joste; Brigette M Ronnett; Mark Stoler; William C Hunt; Mark Schiffman; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Teledermatology: its role in dermatosurgery.

Authors:  Garehatty Rudrappa Kanthraj
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-07

Review 8.  Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz; John H Sinard; Walter H Henricks; Lisa A Fatheree; Alexis B Carter; Lydia Contis; Bruce A Beckwith; Andrew J Evans; Avtar Lal; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Rapid and robust whole slide imaging based on LED-array illumination and color-multiplexed single-shot autofocusing.

Authors:  Shaowei Jiang; Zichao Bian; Xizhi Huang; Pengming Song; He Zhang; Yongbing Zhang; Guoan Zheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-05

10.  Development of a teledermatopathology consultation system using virtual slides.

Authors:  Ikunori Nakayama; Tsubasa Matsumura; Akihisa Kamataki; Miwa Uzuki; Kenji Saito; James Hobbs; Toshihide Akasaka; Takashi Sawai
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.