Literature DB >> 17270181

A comparison of the outcomes between twin and reduced twin pregnancies produced through assisted reproduction.

Chong-U Cheang1, Lii-Shung Huang, Tsung-Hsien Lee, Chung-Hsien Liu, Yang-Tse Shih, Maw-Sheng Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of twin pregnancies, derived from IVF cycles, with and without fetal reduction.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: The IVF Division of the Lee Women's Hospital, Taiwan. PATIENT(S): Seven hundred forty-two twin pregnancies, including 389 nonreduced pregnancies, 353 of which resulted from fetal reduction. INTERVENTION(S): Selective fetal reduction for high-order multiple pregnancies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The rates of extreme prematurity and prematurity (i.e., less than 28 and 36 weeks gestational age, respectively), frequency of birth weight discordance, mean birth weight of twins, neonatal mortality, and morbidity. RESULT(S): The fetal reduction group was associated with a higher incidence of extreme prematurity, prematurity, and lower birth weight than the nonreduced group, although the impact was relatively small. These findings were more pronounced among patients with a higher initial number of fetuses. The rates of discordant birth weights between the two groups were not significantly different. CONCLUSION(S): High-order multiple pregnancies after fetal reduction is still associated with a mild increased risk of premature delivery and low birth weight when compared to nonreduced twin pregnancies. These results provide an additional reason to limit the number of embryos transferred during IVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17270181     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

1.  Double trouble: should double embryo transfer be banned?

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; G Owen Schaefer; Kelton Tremellen; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2015-04

2.  Fetal Reduction Could Improve but Not Completely Reverse the Pregnancy Outcomes of Multiple Pregnancies: Experience From a Single Center.

Authors:  Zhu Yimin; Tang Minyue; Fu Yanling; Yan Huanmiao; Sun Saijun; Li Qingfang; Hu Xiaoling; Xing Lanfeng
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  The clinical outcomes of selective and spontaneous fetal reduction of twins to a singleton pregnancy in the first trimester: a retrospective study of 10 years.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Fei Tang; Bing Song; Guanjian Li; Qiong Xing; Yunxia Cao
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 4.  Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Authors:  Laxmi A Kondapalli; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Obstetric outcomes in reduced and non-reduced twin pregnancies. A single hospital experience.

Authors:  UmmKulthoum E AlShelaly; Noor H Al-Mousa; Wesam I Kurdi
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Perinatal Outcome in Assisted Reproductive Pregnancies: Comparative Analysis of Reduced versus Unreduced Gestation.

Authors:  Shilpa Bhandari; Pallavi Agrawal; Ishita Ganguly; Aparna Singh; Nitika Gupta
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2016-11-23

7.  Trichorionic quadruplet delivered beyond 36 weeks of gestation: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Fawaz E Edris
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.