Literature DB >> 17268171

Correlating breakage-fusion-bridge events with the overall chromosomal instability and in vitro karyotype evolution in prostate cancer.

B Vukovic1, B Beheshti, P Park, G Lim, J Bayani, M Zielenska, J A Squire.   

Abstract

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is thought to underlie the generation of chromosomal changes and genomic heterogeneity during prostatic tumorigenesis. The breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycle is one of the CIN mechanisms responsible for characteristic mitotic abnormalities and the occurrence of specific classes of genomic rearrangements. However, there is little detailed information concerning the role of BFB and CIN in generating genomic diversity in prostate cancer. In this study we have used molecular cytogenetic methods and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis (aCGH) of DU145, PC3, LNCaP, 1532T and 1542T to investigate the in vitro role of BFB as a CIN mechanism in karyotype evolution. Analysis of mitotic structures in all five prostate cancer cell lines showed increased frequency of anaphase bridges and nuclear strings. Structurally rearranged dicentric chromosomes were observed in all of the investigated cell lines, and Spectral Karyotyping (SKY) analysis was used to identify the participating rearranged chromosomes. Multicolor banding (mBAND) and aCGH analysis of some of the more complex chromosomal rearrangements and associated amplicons identified inverted duplications, most frequently involving chromosome 8. Chromosomal breakpoint analysis showed there was a higher frequency of rearrangement at centromeric and pericentromeric genomic regions. The distribution of inverted duplications and ladder-like amplifications was mapped by mBAND and by aCGH. Adjacent spacing of focal amplifications and microdeletions were observed, and focal amplification of centromeric and end sequences was present, particularly in the most unstable line DU145. SKY analysis of this line identified chromosome segments fusing with multiple recipient chromosomes (jumping translocations) identifying potential dicentric sources. Telomere free end analysis indicated loss of DNA sequence. Moreover, the cell lines with the shortest telomeres had the most complex karyotypes, suggesting that despite the expression of telomerase, the reduced telomere length could be driving the observed BFB events and elevated levels of CIN in these lines. Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17268171     DOI: 10.1159/000097411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  23 in total

1.  Cytogenetically balanced translocations are associated with focal copy number alterations.

Authors:  Spencer K Watson; Ronald J deLeeuw; Doug E Horsman; Jeremy A Squire; Wan L Lam
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Molecular and cellular pathways associated with chromosome 1p deletions during colon carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Claire M Payne; Cheray Crowley-Skillicorn; Carol Bernstein; Hana Holubec; Harris Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-03

3.  Mechanisms of leukemia translocations.

Authors:  Jac A Nickoloff; Leyma P De Haro; Justin Wray; Robert Hromas
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.284

Review 4.  Telomere shortening and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Zhiyou Cai; Liang-Jun Yan; Anna Ratka
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  Organ-wide telomeric status in diseased and disease-free prostatic tissues.

Authors:  Christopher M Heaphy; Trisha M Fleet; Eric G Treat; Sang-Joon Lee; Anthony Y Smith; Michael S Davis; Jeffrey K Griffith; Edgar G Fischer; Marco Bisoffi
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Genomic instability and copy-number heterogeneity of chromosome 19q, including the kallikrein locus, in ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  Jane Bayani; Paula Marrano; Cassandra Graham; Yingye Zheng; Lin Li; Dionyssios Katsaros; Heini Lassus; Ralf Butzow; Jeremy A Squire; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.603

7.  Dynamic chromosomal rearrangements in Hodgkin's lymphoma are due to ongoing three-dimensional nuclear remodeling and breakage-bridge-fusion cycles.

Authors:  Amanda Guffei; Rahul Sarkar; Ludger Klewes; Christiaan Righolt; Hans Knecht; Sabine Mai
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  Distinct patterns of structural and numerical chromosomal instability characterize sporadic ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jane Bayani; Jana Paderova; Joan Murphy; Barry Rosen; Maria Zielenska; Jeremy A Squire
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.715

9.  Telomere-centromere-driven genomic instability contributes to karyotype evolution in a mouse model of melanoma.

Authors:  Amanda Gonçalves Dos Santos Silva; Herbert Alexander Graves; Amanda Guffei; Tatiana Iervolino Ricca; Renato Arruda Mortara; Miriam Galvonas Jasiulionis; Sabine Mai
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 10.  Telomeres and telomerase in prostate cancer development and therapy.

Authors:  Mindy Kim Graham; Alan Meeker
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.