Literature DB >> 17265924

Environmental implications of municipal solid waste-derived ethanol.

Youssouf Kalogo1, Shiva Habibi, Heather L MacLean, Satish V Joshi.   

Abstract

We model a municipal solid waste (MSW)-to-ethanol facility that employs dilute acid hydrolysis and gravity pressure vessel technology and estimate life cycle energy use and air emissions. We compare our results, assuming the ethanol is utilized as E85 (blended with 15% gasoline) in a light-duty vehicle, with extant life cycle assessments of gasoline, corn-ethanol, and energy crop-cellulosic-ethanol fueled vehicles. We also compare MSW-ethanol production, as a waste management alternative, with landfilling with gas recovery options. We find that the life cycle total energy use per vehicle mile traveled for MSW-ethanol is less than that of corn-ethanol and cellulosic-ethanol; and energy use from petroleum sources for MSW-ethanol is lower than for the other fuels. MSW-ethanol use in vehicles reduces net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 65% compared to gasoline, and by 58% when compared to corn-ethanol. Relative GHG performance with respect to cellulosic ethanol depends on whether MSW classification is included or not. Converting MSW to ethanol will result in net fossil energy savings of 397-1830 MJ/MT MSW compared to net fossil energy consumption of 177-577 MJ/MT MSW for landfilling. However, landfilling with LFG recovery either for flaring or for electricity production results in greater reductions in GHG emissions compared to MSW-to-ethanol conversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17265924     DOI: 10.1021/es061117b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Comparative life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol production: biochemical versus thermochemical conversion.

Authors:  Dongyan Mu; Thomas Seager; P Suresh Rao; Fu Zhao
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Fungal biodegradation and enzymatic modification of lignin.

Authors:  Mehdi Dashtban; Heidi Schraft; Tarannum A Syed; Wensheng Qin
Journal:  Int J Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2010-05-23

3.  Whole Proteome Analyses on Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum Show a Modulation of the Cellulolysis Machinery in Response to Cellulosic Materials with Subtle Differences in Chemical and Structural Properties.

Authors:  Nelly Badalato; Alain Guillot; Victor Sabarly; Marc Dubois; Nina Pourette; Bruno Pontoire; Paul Robert; Arnaud Bridier; Véronique Monnet; Diana Z Sousa; Sylvie Durand; Laurent Mazéas; Alain Buléon; Théodore Bouchez; Gérard Mortha; Ariane Bize
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Scale-up and process integration of sugar production by acidolysis of municipal solid waste/corn stover blends in ionic liquids.

Authors:  Chenlin Li; Ling Liang; Ning Sun; Vicki S Thompson; Feng Xu; Akash Narani; Qian He; Deepti Tanjore; Todd R Pray; Blake A Simmons; Seema Singh
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 5.  Fungal bioconversion of lignocellulosic residues; opportunities & perspectives.

Authors:  Mehdi Dashtban; Heidi Schraft; Wensheng Qin
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 6.580

6.  An economic and ecological perspective of ethanol production from renewable agro waste: a review.

Authors:  Latika Bhatia; Sonia Johri; Rumana Ahmad
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.298

7.  Benefits and perspectives on the use of biofuels.

Authors:  Juan-Luis Ramos; Miguel Valdivia; Francisco García-Lorente; Ana Segura
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 5.813

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.