Literature DB >> 17265041

Induction of cortical plastic changes in wrist muscles by paired associative stimulation in healthy subjects and post-stroke patients.

Evelyne Castel-Lacanal1, Angélique Gerdelat-Mas, Philippe Marque, Isabelle Loubinoux, Marion Simonetta-Moreau.   

Abstract

It has been shown on hand muscles in normal subjects that paired associative stimulation (PAS) combining peripheral nerve stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) induces lasting changes in cortical motor excitability (Stefan et al., Brain 123 (Pt3):572-584, 2000). Because the motor recovery of distal upper limb and particularly wrist extension in post-stroke patients is one of the major rehabilitation challenge, we investigate here the effect of one session of paired associative stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal projection to extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle (motor evoked potential size) before and after PAS in 17 healthy subjects and in two patients 5 months after stroke. The time course, the topographical specificity, changes in rest motor threshold (RMT), short intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation (SICI and ICF), the respective role of cutaneous and muscular afferents and the effect of a prolonged peripheral stimulation alone were also studied in normal subjects. Using a protocol derived from that of Ridding et al. J Physiol 537:623-631 (2001), PAS was able to induce lasting changes in the excitability of corticospinal projection to wrist muscles in healthy subjects and in the two post-stroke patients studied. Electrophysiological features of these plastic changes were similar to those previously observed in hand muscles: rapid evolution, 30-60 min duration, reversibility, relative topographical specificity and associative dependence suggesting an LTP-like mechanism. A contribution of cutaneous afferents in inducing PAS effects was also demonstrated. The decrease in ECR RMT after PAS observed in patients and in healthy subjects was an unexpected result because it has not been previously reported in the hand muscles of healthy subjects. However, it has been observed in dystonic patients (Quartarone et al., Brain 126:2586-2596, 2003). This suggests that other mechanisms like changes in membrane excitability could be involved in ECR facilitation after PAS. Further studies performed on patients using daily repeated PAS protocols and showing a functional improvement in hand motor function will be necessary to confirm that this technique could be relevant in motor rehabilitation, at least for some selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17265041     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0844-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  24 in total

1.  Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  M C Ridding; B Brouwer; T S Miles; J B Pitcher; P D Thompson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain.

Authors:  M Hallett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Does induction of plastic change in motor cortex improve leg function after stroke?

Authors:  J Uy; M C Ridding; S Hillier; P D Thompson; T S Miles
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee.

Authors:  P M Rossini; A T Barker; A Berardelli; M D Caramia; G Caruso; R Q Cracco; M R Dimitrijević; M Hallett; Y Katayama; C H Lücking
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-08

5.  Induction of persistent changes in the organisation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Darrin R McKay; Michael C Ridding; Philip D Thompson; Timothy S Miles
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Peripheral afferent inputs to the forelimb area of the monkey motor cortex: input-output relations.

Authors:  I Rosén; H Asanuma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  R Chen; J Classen; C Gerloff; P Celnik; E M Wassermann; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Wolters; Friedhelm Sandbrink; Antje Schlottmann; Erwin Kunesch; Katja Stefan; Leonardo G Cohen; Reiner Benecke; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Learning modifies subsequent induction of long-term potentiation-like and long-term depression-like plasticity in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann; Tihomir V Ilić; Tihomir V Iliać; Christian Pauli; Frank Meintzschel; Diane Ruge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Abnormal associative plasticity of the human motor cortex in writer's cramp.

Authors:  Angelo Quartarone; Sergio Bagnato; Vincenzo Rizzo; Hartwig R Siebner; Vincenzo Dattola; Antonio Scalfari; Francesca Morgante; Fortunato Battaglia; Marcello Romano; Paolo Girlanda
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  15 in total

1.  Neural substrates of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation during movement in healthy subjects and acute stroke patients. A PET study.

Authors:  Fabrice Conchou; Isabelle Loubinoux; Evelyne Castel-Lacanal; Anne Le Tinnier; Angélique Gerdelat-Mas; Nathalie Faure-Marie; Helene Gros; Claire Thalamas; Fabienne Calvas; Isabelle Berry; François Chollet; Marion Simonetta Moreau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Paired associative transcranial alternating current stimulation increases the excitability of corticospinal projections in humans.

Authors:  Emmet McNickle; Richard G Carson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Cortical plasticity is preserved in nondemented older individuals with severe ischemic small vessel disease.

Authors:  Jonathan List; Thomas Duning; Julia Kürten; Michael Deppe; Eike Wilbers; Agnes Flöel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Michael A Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Effects of combined peripheral nerve stimulation and brain polarization on performance of a motor sequence task after chronic stroke.

Authors:  Pablo Celnik; Nam-Jong Paik; Yves Vandermeeren; Michael Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Neurostimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Windsor Kwan-Chun Ting; Faïza Abdou-Rahaman Fadul; Shirley Fecteau; Christian Ethier
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Induction of cortical plasticity for reciprocal muscles by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Makoto Suzuki; Hikari Kirimoto; Kazuhiro Sugawara; Makoto Watanabe; Shinobu Shimizu; Ikuyo Ishizaka; Sumio Yamada; Atsuhiko Matsunaga; Michinari Fukuda; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 8.  Non-invasive brain stimulation: an interventional tool for enhancing behavioral training after stroke.

Authors:  Maximilian J Wessel; Máximo Zimerman; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Paired Associative Stimulation Targeting the Tibialis Anterior Muscle using either Mono or Biphasic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting; Andrew J T Stevenson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Modulation of human corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Richard G Carson; Niamh C Kennedy
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.