Literature DB >> 17264376

Consequences of leaf calibration errors on IMRT delivery.

M Sastre-Padro1, J Welleweerd, E Malinen, K Eilertsen, D R Olsen, U A van der Heide.   

Abstract

IMRT treatments using multi-leaf collimators may involve a large number of segments in order to spare the organs at risk. When a large proportion of these segments are small, leaf positioning errors may become relevant and have therapeutic consequences. The performance of four head and neck IMRT treatments under eight different cases of leaf positioning errors has been studied. Systematic leaf pair offset errors in the range of +/-2.0 mm were introduced, thus modifying the segment sizes of the original IMRT plans. Thirty-six films were irradiated with the original and modified segments. The dose difference and the gamma index (with 2%/2 mm criteria) were used for evaluating the discrepancies between the irradiated films. The median dose differences were linearly related to the simulated leaf pair errors. In the worst case, a 2.0 mm error generated a median dose difference of 1.5%. Following the gamma analysis, two out of the 32 modified plans were not acceptable. In conclusion, small systematic leaf bank positioning errors have a measurable impact on the delivered dose and may have consequences for the therapeutic outcome of IMRT.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17264376     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/4/019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the ability of three commercially available dosimeters to detect systematic delivery errors in step-and-shoot IMRT plans.

Authors:  Alison Gray; Omemh Bawazeer; Sankar Arumugam; Philip Vial; Joseph Descallar; David Thwaites; Lois Holloway
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-09-30

2.  Quality assurance of MLC leaf position accuracy and relative dose effect at the MLC abutment region using an electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  Iori Sumida; Hajime Yamaguchi; Hisao Kizaki; Masahiko Koizumi; Toshiyuki Ogata; Yutaka Takahashi; Yasuo Yoshioka
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Radiobiological model-based bio-anatomical quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Park; Jeong-Woo Lee; Jin-Beom Chung; Kyoung-Sik Choi; Yon-Lae Kim; Byung-Moon Park; Youhyun Kim; Jungmin Kim; Jonghak Choi; Jae-Sung Kim; Semie Hong; Tae-Suk Suh
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  On the sensitivity of patient-specific IMRT QA to MLC positioning errors.

Authors:  Guanghua Yan; Chihray Liu; Thomas A Simon; Lee-Cheng Peng; Christopher Fox; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.