Literature DB >> 17264015

Laboratory-based vascular anastomosis training: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of bench model fidelity and level of training on skill acquisition.

Ravi S Sidhu1, Jason Park, Ryan Brydges, Helen M MacRae, Adam Dubrowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although there is growing evidence that practice on bench model simulators can improve the acquisition of technical skill in surgery, the degree to which these models have to approximate real-world conditions (model fidelity) to optimize learning is unclear. Previous research suggests that low-fidelity models may be adequate for novice learners. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of model fidelity and surgical expertise on the acquisition of vascular anastomosis skill.
METHODS: Twenty-seven surgical residents participated in this institutional review board-approved study. Junior residents (postgraduate year 1 and 2) and senior residents (postgraduate year 4 or higher) were randomized into two groups: low-fidelity (n = 13) and high-fidelity (n = 14) model training. Both groups were given a 3-hour hands-on training session: the low-fidelity group used plastic models, and the high-fidelity group used human cadaver arms (brachial arteries) to practice graft-to-arterial anastomosis. One week later, all subjects participated in an animal laboratory in which they performed a single vascular anastomosis on a live, anesthetized pig (femoral artery). A blinded vascular surgeon scored candidate performance in the animal laboratory by using previously validated end points, including a checklist and final product analysis score.
RESULTS: Acquisition of skill was significantly affected by model fidelity and level of training as measured by both the checklist (P = .03) and final product analysis (P = .01; Kruskal-Wallis). Specifically, junior residents practicing on high-fidelity models scored better on the checklist (P = .05) and final product analysis (P = .04). Senior residents practicing on high-fidelity models scored better on final product analysis (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Training in the laboratory does improve skill when assessed in a realistic setting. Both expertise groups showed better skill transfer from the bench model to live animals when practicing on high-fidelity models. For vascular anastomosis, it is important to provide appropriate model fidelity for trainees of different abilities to optimize the effectiveness of bench model training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17264015     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  22 in total

Review 1.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Sandra L de Montbrun; Helen Macrae
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-09

3.  Development and validation of a virtual reality transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsy simulator.

Authors:  Edward D Matsumoto
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Description and evaluation of a bench porcine model for teaching surgical residents vascular anastomosis skills.

Authors:  Philipe N Khalil; Axel Kleespies; Markus Rentsch; Wolfgang E Thasler; Karl-Walter Jauch; Christiane J Bruns
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-07-13

Review 5.  The internal validity of arthroscopic simulators and their effectiveness in arthroscopic education.

Authors:  Jesse Alan Slade Shantz; Jeff R S Leiter; Tania Gottschalk; Peter Benjamin MacDonald
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  eComment. How important is feedback in surgical simulation models?

Authors:  Fahri Gurkan Yesil; Murat Tavlasoglu; Adem Güler
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-02

7.  Instructional Design of Virtual Learning Resources for Anatomy Education.

Authors:  Nicolette S Birbara; Nalini Pather
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 8.  Surgical simulation: the value of individualization.

Authors:  Greta V Bernier; Jaime E Sanchez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Simulation in coronary artery anastomosis early in cardiothoracic surgical residency training: the Boot Camp experience.

Authors:  James I Fann; John H Calhoon; Andrea J Carpenter; Walter H Merrill; John W Brown; Robert S Poston; Maziyar Kalani; Gordon F Murray; George L Hicks; Richard H Feins
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Trauma Technical Skill and Management Exposure for Junior Surgical Residents - The "SAVE Lab 1.0".

Authors:  Emily J Onufer; Darren R Cullinan; Paul E Wise; Laurie J Punch
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 2.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.