Colonoscopy: evaluating indications and diagnostic yield.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopic procedure is an accepted modality for the evaluation of colonic disease. Open-access versus restricted-access colonoscopy has been argued over in the recent literature. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to identify the yield of the major indications for the procedure, and the pattern of colon pathology in our community. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed our experience in 3000 colonoscopies over a five-year period. The patients comprised 1145 females (38%) and 1855 males (62%), and their ages ranged from 9 months to 95 years (mean 39.2). There were 2283 patients (76%) who were aged less than 55 years. Complete examination to the cecum was possible in 2850 cases (95%).
RESULTS: Pathological findings were identified in 640 patients (21%). The diagnostic yield of patients referred for lower abdominal pain and surveillance was low, at 7% and 17%, respectively. The yield was high for those with lower gastrointestinal bleeding (47%), non-bloody diarrhea (35%), iron deficiency anemia (30%), mass lesions identified by radiology (53%), and polyps identified by radiology (70%). Inflammatory bowel disease was diagnosed in 220 patients, carcinoma in 64 patients, and colonic polyps in 139 patients.
CONCLUSION: Colonic diseases are not uncommon in our part of the world. Colonoscopy is a rewarding procedure in those patients referred with lower gastrointestinal bleeding, mass lesions, polyps and diarrhea. The procedure is less rewarding in patients with lower abdominal pain and in those undergoing surveillance colonoscopy. Patient selection on the basis of the presenting complaint may help to utilize the limited resources available to gastroenterologists. About 63% of the procedures were done for indications found to have a low yield. Inflammatory bowel disease is seen with increasing frequency in our population.