OBJECTIVE: To determine which clinical measure of childhood obesity should be monitored to best reflect change in adiposity in a weight management programme and estimate the degree of change needed to be relatively certain of fat reduction. SUBJECTS: 92 obese children with a mean (range) age of 12.8 (6.9-18.9) years and a mean body mass index standard deviation score (BMI SDS) of +3.38 (+2.27 to +4.47) attending a hospital-based clinic on a regular, 3 monthly basis. MEASUREMENTS: Pairs of weight and height measured up to 2.41 years apart used to derive BMI as kg/m2, and adjusted for age and gender to give weight and BMI SDS (BMI-z score) using British 1990 Growth Reference Data. Contemporaneous adiposity estimated by fatness measured by a bioimpedance segmental body composition analyser. RESULTS: Changes in BMI-z scores, compared to BMI, weight and weight SDS, most accurately reflected loss of fat. Reductions of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 BMI SDS equate to expected mean falls in total body fat percentage of 2.9%, 5.8%, 8.7% and 11.6%. Approximate 95% prediction intervals indicated that a fall in BMI SDS of at least 0.6 over 6-12 months (or 0.5 over 0-6 months) is consistent with actual fat loss. CONCLUSION: Change in BMI-z score best reflects percentage fat loss compared to BMI, weight and weight SDS. The wide variation in likely percentage fat loss for a given BMI SDS reduction means a loss of 0.5-0.6 is required to be relatively certain of definite percentage fat reduction.
OBJECTIVE: To determine which clinical measure of childhood obesity should be monitored to best reflect change in adiposity in a weight management programme and estimate the degree of change needed to be relatively certain of fat reduction. SUBJECTS: 92 obesechildren with a mean (range) age of 12.8 (6.9-18.9) years and a mean body mass index standard deviation score (BMI SDS) of +3.38 (+2.27 to +4.47) attending a hospital-based clinic on a regular, 3 monthly basis. MEASUREMENTS: Pairs of weight and height measured up to 2.41 years apart used to derive BMI as kg/m2, and adjusted for age and gender to give weight and BMI SDS (BMI-z score) using British 1990 Growth Reference Data. Contemporaneous adiposity estimated by fatness measured by a bioimpedance segmental body composition analyser. RESULTS: Changes in BMI-z scores, compared to BMI, weight and weight SDS, most accurately reflected loss of fat. Reductions of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 BMI SDS equate to expected mean falls in total body fat percentage of 2.9%, 5.8%, 8.7% and 11.6%. Approximate 95% prediction intervals indicated that a fall in BMI SDS of at least 0.6 over 6-12 months (or 0.5 over 0-6 months) is consistent with actual fat loss. CONCLUSION: Change in BMI-z score best reflects percentage fat loss compared to BMI, weight and weight SDS. The wide variation in likely percentage fat loss for a given BMI SDS reduction means a loss of 0.5-0.6 is required to be relatively certain of definite percentage fat reduction.
Authors: Ram Weiss; James Dziura; Tania S Burgert; William V Tamborlane; Sara E Taksali; Catherine W Yeckel; Karin Allen; Melinda Lopes; Mary Savoye; John Morrison; Robert S Sherwin; Sonia Caprio Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew A Sabin; Anna Ford; Linda Hunt; Riyaz Jamal; Elizabeth C Crowne; Julian P H Shield Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Denise E Wilfley; Amanda E Staiano; Myra Altman; Jeanne Lindros; Angela Lima; Sandra G Hassink; William H Dietz; Stephen Cook Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Lori J Stark; Stephanie Spear Filigno; Christopher Bolling; Megan B Ratcliff; Jessica C Kichler; Shannon L Robson; Stacey L Simon; Mary Beth McCullough; Lisa M Clifford; Cathleen O Stough; Cynthia Zion; Richard F Ittenbach Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Joel E Lavine; Laura A Wilson; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Stavra A Xanthakos; Rohit Kohli; Sarah E Barlow; Miriam B Vos; Saul J Karpen; Jean P Molleston; Peter F Whitington; Philip Rosenthal; Ajay K Jain; Karen F Murray; Elizabeth M Brunt; David E Kleiner; Mark L Van Natta; Jeanne M Clark; James Tonascia; Edward Doo Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Lori J Stark; Lisa M Clifford; Elizabeth K Towner; Stephanie S Filigno; Cindy Zion; Christopher Bolling; Joseph Rausch Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2014-07-30