Literature DB >> 17260380

Inability to directly detect magnetic field changes associated with neuronal activity.

Laura M Parkes1, Floris P de Lange, Pascal Fries, Ivan Toni, David G Norris.   

Abstract

The ability to directly detect neuronal magnetic fields by MRI would help investigators achieve the "holy grail" of neuroimaging, namely both high spatial and temporal resolution. Both positive and negative findings have been reported in the literature, with no clear consensus as to the feasibility of direct detection. The aim of this study was to replicate one of the most promising published in vivo results. A second aim was to investigate the use of steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs), which give a large evoked response and offer a well-controlled approach because the frequency of the neuronal response can be dictated by the experimenter. For both studies we used a general linear model (GLM) that included regressors for both the expected blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal and the magnetic source (MS) signal. The results showed no activity that could be attributed to the neuromagnetic signals in either study, and no frequency component corresponding to the frequency of the ssVEPs. This study demonstrates that for the particular stimuli and hardware used, the sensitivity of the magnitude MRI signal to detect evoked neuronal currents is too low to be of practical use. Copyright (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17260380     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  19 in total

Review 1.  A cable theory based biophysical model of resistance change in crab peripheral nerve and human cerebral cortex during neuronal depolarisation: implications for electrical impedance tomography of fast neural activity in the brain.

Authors:  Adam Liston; Richard Bayford; David Holder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of oscillating electrical currents.

Authors:  Nicholas W Halpern-Manners; Vikram S Bajaj; Thomas Z Teisseyre; Alexander Pines
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Failure to direct detect magnetic field dephasing corresponding to ERP generation.

Authors:  Lin Tang; Malcolm J Avison; James C Gatenby; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Stimulus-induced Rotary Saturation (SIRS): a potential method for the detection of neuronal currents with MRI.

Authors:  Thomas Witzel; Fa-Hsuan Lin; Bruce R Rosen; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A novel method for recording neuronal depolarization with recording at 125-825 Hz: implications for imaging fast neural activity in the brain with electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  T Oh; O Gilad; A Ghosh; M Schuettler; D S Holder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Direct detection of a single evoked action potential with MRS in Lumbricus terrestris.

Authors:  Alexander J Poplawsky; Raymond Dingledine; Xiaoping P Hu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Brain active transmembrane water cycling measured by MR is associated with neuronal activity.

Authors:  Ruiliang Bai; Charles S Springer; Dietmar Plenz; Peter J Basser
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Characterization of non-hemodynamic functional signal measured by spin-lock fMRI.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  On consciousness, resting state fMRI, and neurodynamics.

Authors:  Arvid Lundervold
Journal:  Nonlinear Biomed Phys       Date:  2010-06-03

10.  Physiologically evoked neuronal current MRI in a bloodless turtle brain: detectable or not?

Authors:  Qingfei Luo; Huo Lu; Hanbing Lu; David Senseman; Keith Worsley; Yihong Yang; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.