Literature DB >> 17259567

A five-year experience with the use of BiPAP in a pediatric intensive care unit population.

Gayatri Joshi1, Joseph D Tobias.   

Abstract

The authors retrospectively reviewed their experience with bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) to treat respiratory insufficiency in pediatric patients over a 5-year period. After excluding patients on chronic home BiPAP and those in whom BiPAP was used to facilitate tracheal extubation (because there were no pre-BiPAP values on which to judge its efficacy), the study cohort included 45 patients (1.5 to 22 years) in whom BiPAP was used for acute respiratory insufficiency. The primary indication for BiPAP was a primary pulmonary parenchymal process in 29 patients and postoperative atelectasis with respiratory insufficiency following cardiac or upper abdominal surgery in 16 patients. There were no differences in the pre-BiPAP values of oxygen requirement, PCO2, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate between the 2 groups. With the application of BiPAP in patients with primary pulmonary parenchymal disease, there was a decreased oxygen requirement, PCO2, and respiratory rate. No change in oxygen saturation was noted. In patients with postoperative respiratory insufficiency, there was an improvement in all 4 parameters. There was no difference in post-BiPAP values of oxygen requirement, respiratory rate, or PCO2 between the 2 groups. The post-BiPAP oxygen saturation was greater in patients with postoperative respiratory insufficiency (96% +/- 4%) than in patients with primary pulmonary parenchymal disease (92% +/- 6%, P = .02). Endotracheal intubation was required in 11 of 29 patients with primary pulmonary parenchymal pathology versus 1 of 16 patients with postoperative atelectasis and/or respiratory insufficiency (P = .03). The chances of requiring intubation were greater in patients < or = 6 years of age (relative risk 1.9), if the oxygen requirement did not decrease to less than 60% within the first 24 hours of BiPAP use (relative risk 3.3) and if there were any PCO2 values > or = 55 mmHg during the first 24 hours of BiPAP use (relative risk 9.8). No severe complications to BiPAP were noted. BiPAP safely and effectively improves the respiratory status of and might decrease the need for endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients with acute respiratory insufficiency of various etiologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17259567     DOI: 10.1177/0885066606295221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0885-0666            Impact factor:   3.510


  12 in total

1.  Predicting the success of non-invasive ventilation in preventing intubation and re-intubation in the paediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Christopher S James; Christopher P J Hallewell; Dominique P L James; Angie Wade; Quen Q Mok
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Safety and clinical findings of BiPAP utilization in children 20 kg or less for asthma exacerbations.

Authors:  Abby M Williams; Thomas J Abramo; Malee V Shah; Renee A Miller; Cheryl Burney-Jones; Samantha Rooks; Cristina Estrada; Donald H Arnold
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Noninvasive ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory failure by means of a conventional volumetric ventilator.

Authors:  Juan I Muñoz-Bonet; Eva M Flor-Macián; Patricia M Roselló; Mari C Llopis; Alicia Lizondo; José L López-Prats; Juan Brines
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 2.764

4.  Predicting non-invasive ventilation failure in children from the SpO₂/FiO₂ (SF) ratio.

Authors:  Juan Mayordomo-Colunga; Martí Pons; Yolanda López; M José Solana; Corsino Rey; Pablo Martínez-Camblor; Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez; Jesús López-Herce; Alberto Medina; Clara Abadesso; M Angeles García-Teresa; Mirella Gáboli; Milagros García-López; María González-Sánchez; Paula Madurga-Revilla; Amelia González-Calvar; Eider Oñate
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Predictive factors of non invasive ventilation failure in critically ill children: a prospective epidemiological study.

Authors:  Juan Mayordomo-Colunga; Alberto Medina; Corsino Rey; Juan José Díaz; Andrés Concha; Marta Los Arcos; Sergio Menéndez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Non invasive ventilation after extubation in paediatric patients: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Juan Mayordomo-Colunga; Alberto Medina; Corsino Rey; Andrés Concha; Sergio Menéndez; Marta Los Arcos; Irene García
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in critically ill children with cardiac disease.

Authors:  Lubica Kovacikova; Peter Skrak; Dusan Dobos; Martin Zahorec
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Efficacy and predictors of success of noninvasive ventilation for prevention of extubation failure in critically ill children with heart disease.

Authors:  Punkaj Gupta; Jacob E Kuperstock; Sana Hashmi; Vickie Arnolde; Jeffrey M Gossett; Parthak Prodhan; Shekhar Venkataraman; Stephen J Roth
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure in children: a concise review.

Authors:  Abolfazl Najaf-Zadeh; Francis Leclerc
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Risk Factors for Noninvasive Ventilation Failure in Children Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.

Authors:  Courtney M Rowan; Julie C Fitzgerald; Asya Agulnik; Matt S Zinter; Matthew P Sharron; James E Slaven; Erin M Kreml; Rajinder P S Bajwa; Kris M Mahadeo; Jerelyn Moffet; Keiko M Tarquinio; Marie E Steiner
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.