Literature DB >> 17258973

Balloon-based, circumferential, endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus: 1-year follow-up of 100 patients.

Virender K Sharma1, Kenneth K Wang, Bergein F Overholt, Charles J Lightdale, M Brian Fennerty, Patrick J Dean, Douglas K Pleskow, Ram Chuttani, Alvaro Reymunde, Nilda Santiago, Kenneth J Chang, Michael B Kimmey, David E Fleischer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the dose-response, safety, and efficacy of circumferential endoscopic ablation of Barrett's esophagus (BE) by using an endoscopic balloon-based ablation device (HALO360 System).
DESIGN: This study was conducted in 2 serial phases (dosimetry phase and effectiveness phase) to evaluate a balloon-based ablation device that delivers a pre-set amount of energy density (J/cm2) to BE tissue. The dosimetry phase evaluated the dose-response and the safety of delivering 6 to 12 J/cm2. The effectiveness phase used 10 J/cm2 (delivered twice [x2]) for all patients, followed by EGD with biopsies at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. A second ablation procedure was performed if BE was present at 1 or 3 months. Patients received esomeprazole 40 mg twice a day for 1 month after ablation, and 40 mg every day thereafter. Postablation symptoms were quantified by using a 14-day symptom diary (scale, 0-100). A complete response (CR) was defined as all biopsy specimens negative for BE at 12 months.
SETTING: Eight U.S. centers, between September 2003 and September 2005. PATIENTS: Patients were 18 to 75 years of age, with a diagnosis of BE (without dysplasia), with histopathology reconfirmation of the diagnosis within 6 months of enrollment.
RESULTS: In the dosimetry phase, 32 patients (29 men; mean age, 56.8 years) were enrolled. Median symptom scores returned to a score of 0 of 100 by day 3. There were no dose-related serious adverse events, and the outcomes at 1 and 3 months permitted the selection of 10 J/cm2 (x2) for the subsequent effectiveness phase of the study. In the effectiveness phase, 70 patients (52 men, 18 women; mean age, 55.7 years) were enrolled. Median symptom scores returned to a score of 0 of 100 by day 4. At 12 months (n = 69; mean, 1.5 sessions), a CR for BE was achieved in 70% of patients. There were no strictures and no buried glandular mucosa in either study phase (4306 biopsy fragments evaluated).
CONCLUSIONS: Circumferential ablation of nondysplastic BE by using this balloon-based ablation device can be performed with no subsequent strictures or buried glands and with complete elimination of BE in 70% of patients at 1-year follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17258973     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  87 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic management of chronic radiation proctitis.

Authors:  Tarun Rustagi; Hiroshi Mashimo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: focus on current treatment options.

Authors:  Leonidas Lekakos; Nikolaos P Karidis; Dimitrios Dimitroulis; Christos Tsigris; Gregory Kouraklis; Nikolaos Nikiteas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.

Authors:  Omar A Jarral; Sanjay Purkayastha; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; George B Hanna; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Endoscopic treatments for early esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Lightdale
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-12

5.  Biodegradable esophageal stent placement does not prevent high-grade stricture formation after circumferential mucosal resection in a porcine model.

Authors:  Eric M Pauli; Steve J Schomisch; Joseph P Furlan; Andrea S Marks; Amitabh Chak; Richard H Lash; Jeffrey L Ponsky; Jeffrey M Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The cost effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Chin Hur; Sung Eun Choi; Joel H Rubenstein; Chung Yin Kong; Norman S Nishioka; Dawn T Provenzale; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus: advances in endoscopic techniques.

Authors:  Ali Azarm; Ismet Lukolic; Meenal Shukla; Ronald Concha-Parra; Frank Gress
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William W Hope; Geoffrey P Kohn; Patrick R Reardon; William S Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus: let's not get ahead of ourselves.

Authors:  Gary W Falk
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Esophagus and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Ricardo Londono; Blair A Jobe; Toshitaka Hoppo; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.