Literature DB >> 17258628

Clinical and radiographic assessment of various predictors for healing outcome 1 year after periapical surgery.

Thomas von Arx1, Simon Storgård Jensen, Stefan Hänni.   

Abstract

This clinical study prospectively evaluated the influence of various predictors on healing outcome 1 year after periapical surgery. The study cohort included 194 teeth in an equal number of patients. Three teeth were lost for the follow-up (1.5% drop-out rate). Clinical and radiographic measures were used to determine the healing outcome. For statistical analysis, results were dichotomized (healed versus nonhealed). The overall success rate was 83.8% (healed cases). The only individual predictors to prove significant for the outcome were pain at initial examination (p=0.030) and other clinical signs or symptoms at initial examination (p=0.042), meaning that such teeth had lower healing rates 1 year after periapical surgery compared with teeth without such signs or symptoms. Logistic regression revealed that pain at initial examination (odds ratio=2.59, confidence interval=1.2-5.6, p=0.04) was the only predictor reaching significance. Several predictors almost reached statistical significance: lesion size (p=0.06), retrofilling material (p=0.06), and postoperative healing course (p=0.06).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17258628     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  17 in total

Review 1.  Apical surgery: A review of current techniques and outcome.

Authors:  Thomas von Arx
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-11-11

Review 2.  Pre- and postoperative management techniques. Part 3: before and after - endodontic surgery.

Authors:  J Mansoor
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Long-term outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Chiara Pirani; Stefano Chersoni; Lucio Montebugnoli; Carlo Prati
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Success rate 1 year after apical surgery: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Eveline Sutter; Silvio Valdec; Dominique Bichsel; Daniel Wiedemeier; Martin Rücker; Bernd Stadlinger
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-11-22

5.  The study of bone healing after endodontic microsurgery using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amparo Ramis-Alario; Beatriz Tarazona-Álvarez; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; David Soto-Peñaloza; María Peñarrocha-Diago; David Peñarrocha-Oltra
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-08-01

6.  Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Apical Surgery: A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Faruk Öğütlü; İnci Karaca
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-04-08

Review 7.  Biologic response of local hemostatic agents used in endodontic microsurgery.

Authors:  Youngjune Jang; Hyeon Kim; Byoung-Duck Roh; Euiseong Kim
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2014-03-21

8.  Influence of hemostatic agents upon the outcome of periapical surgery: dressings with anesthetic and vasoconstrictor or aluminum chloride.

Authors:  María Peñarrocha-Diago; Laura Maestre-Ferrín; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Thomas von Arx; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-03-01

9.  Nonsurgical management of an extensive endodontic lesion in an orthodontic patient by calcium-enriched mixture apical plug.

Authors:  Saeed Asgary; Mahta Fazlyab
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-04

Review 10.  Prognostic factors on periapical surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mireia Serrano-Giménez; Alba Sánchez-Torres; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.