Literature DB >> 17258213

Effect of female partner age on pregnancy rates after vasectomy reversal.

Edward R Gerrard1, Jay I Sandlow, Robert A Oster, John R Burns, Lyndon C Box, Peter N Kolettis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of female partner age on pregnancy rates after vasectomy reversal.
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Two academic infertility practices. PATIENT(S): Men undergoing vasectomy reversal and their partners. INTERVENTION(S): Microsurgical vasectomy reversal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Patency and pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): Two hundred ninety-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Groups were similar with regard to types of procedure performed (vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy), obstructive interval, female factors, number of repeat procedures, and quality of vasal fluid. Patency rates were 90%, 89%, 90%, 86%, and 83% for patients with female partners aged 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, and 40+ years, respectively. Pregnancy rates were 67%, 52%, 57%, 54%, and 14% for patients with female partners aged 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, and 40+ years, respectively. The pregnancy rate for couples with female partner aged 40 or older was lower than for those with the female partner aged 39 or younger (14% vs. 56%). CONCLUSION(S): Pregnancy rates for vasectomy reversal were good regardless of female age as long as the partner was 39 years old or younger. Pregnancy rates were lower if the female partner was 40 or more years old.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17258213     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  12 in total

Review 1.  Surgical techniques for the management of male infertility.

Authors:  Natalya A Lopushnyan; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  Surgical treatment of male infertility in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection - new insights.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ricardo Miyaoka; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 3.  Current status of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  J Ullrich Schwarzer; Heiko Steinfatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Predictive factors for natural pregnancy after microsurgical reconstruction in patients with primary epididymal obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Mihai Harza; Sebastian Voinea; Gener Ismail; Cristian Gagiu; Catalin Baston; Adrian Preda; Ioan Manea; Tiberiu Priporeanu; Ioanel Sinescu
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.257

5.  Factors to consider for informed consent prior to vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  Jason R Kovac; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 6.  Obstructive azoospermia: reconstructive techniques and results.

Authors:  Karen Baker; Edmund Sabanegh
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 7.  Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update.

Authors:  Abhishek P Patel; Ryan P Smith
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Treatment of failed vasectomy reversal using a microsurgical two-layer anastomosis technique.

Authors:  Bingkun Li; Guoling Chen; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2013-06

9.  Loupe-Assisted Vasovasostomy Using a Prolene Stent: A Simpler Vasectomy Reversal Technique.

Authors:  Jong Chul Jeon; Taekmin Kwon; Sejun Park; Sungchan Park; Sang Hyeon Cheon; Kyung Hyun Moon
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 10.  Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.

Authors:  Takeshi Namekawa; Takashi Imamoto; Mayuko Kato; Akira Komiya; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.