Literature DB >> 17256180

Why do patients bypass the nearest hospital? An empirical analysis for orthopaedic care and neurosurgery in the Netherlands.

Marco Varkevisser1, Stéphanie A van der Geest.   

Abstract

Using data for 2003, we find that both for non-emergency orthopaedic care (38%) and neurosurgery (54%) numerous Dutch patients did not visit the nearest hospital. Our estimation results show that extra travel time negatively influences the probability of hospital bypassing. Good waiting time performance by the nearest hospital also significantly decreases the likelihood of a bypass decision. Patients seem to place a lower negative value on extra travel time for orthopaedic care than for neurosurgery. The valuation of shorter waiting time also varies between these two types of hospital care. A good performance of the nearest hospital on waiting time decreases the likelihood of a bypass decision most for neurosurgery. In both samples, patients are more likely to bypass the nearest hospital when it is a university medical centre or a tertiary teaching hospital. Patient attributes, such as age and social status, are also found to significantly affect hospital bypassing. From our analysis it follows that both patient and hospital care heterogeneity should be taken into account when assessing the substitutability of hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17256180     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-006-0035-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  7 in total

1.  Hospital competition, GP fundholders and waiting times in the UK internal market: the case of elective surgery.

Authors:  Ana Xavier
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  European health policy challenges.

Authors:  Alan Maynard
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Rationing and competition in the Dutch health-care system.

Authors:  Frederik T Schut; Wynand P M M Van de Ven
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Spatial competition for quality in the market for hospital care.

Authors:  Marcello Montefiori
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2005-06

Review 5.  Bypassing rural hospitals for obstetrics care.

Authors:  J M Bronstein; M A Morrisey
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.265

6.  Hospital choice of rural Medicare beneficiaries: patient, hospital attributes, and the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  Wan-Tzu Connie Tai; Frank W Porell; E Kathleen Adams
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  What do consumers want to know about the quality of care in hospitals?

Authors:  Shoshanna Sofaer; Christine Crofton; Elizabeth Goldstein; Elizabeth Hoy; Jenny Crabb
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

  7 in total
  27 in total

1.  Ranking sources of hospital quality information for orthopedic surgery patients: consequences for the system of managed competition.

Authors:  Romy Evelien Bes; Bernard van den Berg
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Preferred Primary Healthcare Provider Choice Among Insured Persons in Ashanti Region, Ghana.

Authors:  Micheal Kofi Boachie
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-10-20

3.  Modelling competition in health care markets as a complex adaptive system: an agent-based framework.

Authors:  Abdullah Alibrahim; Shinyi Wu
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2019-01-24

4.  An agent-based simulation model of patient choice of health care providers in accountable care organizations.

Authors:  Abdullah Alibrahim; Shinyi Wu
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2016-10-04

5.  The use of publicly available quality information when choosing a hospital or health-care provider: the role of the GP.

Authors:  Nora Doering; Hans Maarse
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Assessing hospital competition when prices don't matter to patients: the use of time-elasticities.

Authors:  Marco Varkevisser; Stéphanie A van der Geest; Frederik T Schut
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2009-08-07

7.  Patient hospital choice for hip replacement: empirical evidence from the Netherlands.

Authors:  Puck D C Beukers; Ron G M Kemp; Marco Varkevisser
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-10-25

8.  Travel of patients to distant hospitals for elective surgery in Japan: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Kaname Yamamoto; Kiyohide Fushimi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Rural Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock Who Bypass Rural Hospitals Have Increased Mortality: An Instrumental Variables Approach.

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Karisa K Harland; Dan M Shane; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Brian M Fuller; Marcia M Ward; James C Torner
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 10.  A Systematic Review of the Factors that Patients Use to Choose their Surgeon.

Authors:  Alexander T Yahanda; Kelly J Lafaro; Gaya Spolverato; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.