Literature DB >> 17255652

Integrating the DIEP and muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM techniques optimizes surgical outcomes: presentation of an algorithm for microsurgical breast reconstruction based on perforator anatomy.

John T Lindsey1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal surgical outcomes in autogenous breast reconstruction require a balance between the reliability of older transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap techniques and the decreased donor-site morbidity of the newer deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap techniques. This article presents an approach to autogenous breast reconstruction that uses principles of both techniques.
METHODS: One hundred twenty patients receiving 140 breast reconstructions (100 unilateral and 20 bilateral) using the DIEP or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM techniques were retrospectively reviewed over a 5-year period. All patients before January of 2004 (group 1, n = 107 flaps) received the DIEP flap. Patients after January of 2004 (group 2, n = 33 flaps) were approached using an integrated technique and received either the DIEP or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM based on the perforator anatomy identified at the time of surgery.
RESULTS: Average follow-up was 27 months for group 1 (range, 5.2 to 43 months) and 8 months for group 2 (range, 3 to 18 months). By applying the surgical technique according to the algorithm presented, the success rate has been increased to 100 percent (33 of 33 flaps, p = 0.0425, group 2) over the past 18 months without increasing donor-site morbidity. This compares with a success rate of only 92 percent (98 of 107 flaps, group 1) when the DIEP was attempted nonselectively in every case.
CONCLUSION: By integrating DIEP and MS-2 surgical techniques and selectively applying the surgical technique according to the perforator anatomy, microsurgical breast reconstruction can be more reliably offered to patients while still minimizing donor-site morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17255652     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000244743.90178.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: pectoralis major myomammary flap versus DIEP and MS-2 TRAM.

Authors:  Adrian Dragu; Ulrich Kneser; Raymund E Horch
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Optimising the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel Casares Santiago; Emilio García-Tutor; Gil Rodríguez Caravaca; Julián Del Cerro González; Léa Marie Klein; Alberto Alonso-Burgos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Image-guided perforator flap design using invisible near-infrared light and validation with x-ray angiography.

Authors:  Aya Matsui; Bernard T Lee; Joshua H Winer; Vida Kianzad; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Successful Salvage of Delayed Venous Congestion After DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristopher Katira; Samita Goyal; Chelsea Venditto; John A LoGiudice; Erin L Doren
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2019-12-03

5.  Myth-Busting the DIEP Flap and an Introduction to the Abdominal Perforator Exchange (APEX) Breast Reconstruction Technique: A Single-Surgeon Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Frank J DellaCroce; Hannah C DellaCroce; Craig A Blum; Scott K Sullivan; Christopher G Trahan; M Whitten Wise; Irena G Brates
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction without Microsurgery Fellowship Training.

Authors:  Hakan Orbay; Brittany K Busse; Thomas R Stevenson; Howard T Wang; David E Sahar
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.