Literature DB >> 17254431

The feasibility of creating a population-based national twin registry in the United States.

Patricia C Chulada1, Linda A Corey, Vani Vannappagari, Nedra S Whitehead, Perry J Blackshear.   

Abstract

Between 4 to 6 million twins exist in the US today who offer scientists a valuable potential resource for conducting behavioral and biomedical research. However, unlike many other countries, there is no national system in the US for identifying twins and eliciting their participation in these important research programs. Therefore, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) is conducting a study to determine the feasibility of creating a national, population-based twin registry in the US. The major goal is to estimate the potential size and characteristics of a national twin registry based on the current twin population in the US, our ability to ascertain and enroll them, and their willingness to participate. Existing US twin cohorts are also being examined in this study as well as alternatives for improving US twin resources should a national twin registry be deemed infeasible. The various options will be compared in terms of possible source populations, generalizability and adequacy for statistically powering various types of etiological studies. Two expert advisory panels have been assembled to assist in the conduct of this study. The Scientific Advisory Panel is charged with providing expertise concerning study goals, design and methodology, and evaluating the study's conclusion. A separate Ethics Advisory Panel is charged with providing expertise on the ethical, legal, and social issues that might be encountered if a national twin registry is ultimately pursued. Having a national population-based twin registry in the US would be advantageous to US scientists and those worldwide. It would provide ample numbers of twin pairs to conduct various types of environmental genomic studies currently not possible with existing US twin resources. It would also allow US scientists to select for characteristics (race, ethnicity, environments, and so on) inherent in our own population. Finally and foremost, it would help to meet the worldwide demand for twin resources which is expected to increase over time, as new genomic and analytical tools become available and new hypotheses emerge concerning the complex interplay between genes, lifestyles and environment.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17254431      PMCID: PMC1894946          DOI: 10.1375/183242706779462705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet        ISSN: 1832-4274            Impact factor:   1.587


  7 in total

Review 1.  Twins. Novel uses to study complex traits and genetic diseases.

Authors:  A J MacGregor; H Snieder; N J Schork; T D Spector
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  Classical twin studies and beyond.

Authors:  Dorret Boomsma; Andreas Busjahn; Leena Peltonen
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  GenomEUtwin: a strategy to identify genetic influences on health and disease.

Authors:  Leena Peltonen
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2003-10

4.  Identifying a cohort of US twins using Social Security Administration records.

Authors:  Bert Kestenbaum
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2004-04

Review 5.  A twin-pronged attack on complex traits.

Authors:  N Martin; D Boomsma; G Machin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  The Mid-Atlantic Twin Registry.

Authors:  Lisa S Anderson; William T Beverly; Linda A Corey; Lenn Murrelle
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2002-10

Review 7.  Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research?

Authors:  David Wendler; Raynard Kington; Jennifer Madans; Gretchen Van Wye; Heidi Christ-Schmidt; Laura A Pratt; Otis W Brawley; Cary P Gross; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 11.069

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.