INTRODUCTION: Cyclophospamide is used in the treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis. We were looking for predictive indicators of treatment response. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and seven others with primary progressive received monthly infusions of cyclophosphamide (750mg/m2) and methylprednisolone (500mg). During the year before cyclophosphamide the EDSS had worsened one point in all patients with or without surimposed relapses. Evaluation was based on EDSS change at 6, 12, 24 months and 5 years. RESULTS: Among secondary progressive patients, 91 per 100 (43/47) were stable or improved at 12 months, 65 per 100 (26/40) at 24 months and 22 per 100 (5/23) at 5 years. Annual relapse rate decreased from 0.81 before treatment to 0.48 during treatment and 0.12 after treatment (p<0.001). At 24 months, efficacy was correlated to a progressive phase lasting less than 5 years (p<0.01) and to a rapid increase of EDSS of at least 2 points the year before treatment (p<0.05). There were no influences of age, EDSS and surimposed relapses at the beginning of treatment, and other immunoactive drugs administrated before cyclophosphamide. There was no significant difference in quality of response to treatment between patients with primary progressive and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. CONCLUSION: Cyclophosphamide appears to be more efficient in early stage of progressive multiple sclerosis independently of age, relapses or neurological disability scale.
INTRODUCTION:Cyclophospamide is used in the treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis. We were looking for predictive indicators of treatment response. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and seven others with primary progressive received monthly infusions of cyclophosphamide (750mg/m2) and methylprednisolone (500mg). During the year before cyclophosphamide the EDSS had worsened one point in all patients with or without surimposed relapses. Evaluation was based on EDSS change at 6, 12, 24 months and 5 years. RESULTS: Among secondary progressive patients, 91 per 100 (43/47) were stable or improved at 12 months, 65 per 100 (26/40) at 24 months and 22 per 100 (5/23) at 5 years. Annual relapse rate decreased from 0.81 before treatment to 0.48 during treatment and 0.12 after treatment (p<0.001). At 24 months, efficacy was correlated to a progressive phase lasting less than 5 years (p<0.01) and to a rapid increase of EDSS of at least 2 points the year before treatment (p<0.05). There were no influences of age, EDSS and surimposed relapses at the beginning of treatment, and other immunoactive drugs administrated before cyclophosphamide. There was no significant difference in quality of response to treatment between patients with primary progressive and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. CONCLUSION:Cyclophosphamide appears to be more efficient in early stage of progressive multiple sclerosis independently of age, relapses or neurological disability scale.