Literature DB >> 17252956

Preferred low- and high-frequency compression ratios among hearing aid users with moderately severe to profound hearing loss.

Gitte Keidser1, Harvey Dillon, Ole Dyrlund, Lyndal Carter, David Hartley.   

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the low- and high-frequency compression ratios of a fast-acting device that were preferred by people with moderately severe to profound hearing loss. Three compression ratios (1:1, 1.8:1, and 3:1) were combined in the low and high frequencies to produce nine schemes that were evaluated pair-wise for three weeks in the field using an adaptive procedure. The evaluation was performed by 21 experienced hearing aid users with a moderately severe to profound hearing loss. Diaries and an exit interview were used to monitor preferences. Generally, the subjects preferred lower compression ratios than are typically prescribed, especially in the low frequencies. Specifically, 11 subjects preferred linear amplification in the low frequencies, and 14 subjects preferred more compression in the high than in the low frequencies. Preferences could not be predicted from audiometric data, onset of loss, or past experience with amplification. The data suggest that clients with moderately severe to profound hearing loss should be fitted with low-frequency compression ratios in the range 1:1 to 2:1 and that fine-tuning is essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17252956     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.18.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  6 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laura Turton; Pamela Souza; Linda Thibodeau; Louise Hickson; René Gifford; Judith Bird; Maren Stropahl; Lorraine Gailey; Bernadette Fulton; Nerina Scarinci; Katie Ekberg; Barbra Timmer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

Review 2.  NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Lyndal Carter; Anna O'Brien
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-30

3.  Development of Improved Software Intelligent System for Audiological Solutions.

Authors:  S Rajkumar; S Muttan; V Sapthagirivasan; V Jaya; S S Vignesh
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  The Characteristics of Adults with Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover; Michael Blackburn; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Preferred Compression Threshold and Release Time in Quiet and Noisy Conditions for Elderly Korean Hearing Aid Users.

Authors:  Woojae Han; Junghak Lee; Jinsook Kim; Kyeongwon Lee; Dongwook Kim
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2017-09-19

6.  The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure.

Authors:  G Keidser; H Dillon; M Flax; T Ching; S Brewer
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2011-03-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.