Literature DB >> 17251449

Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order aberrations following overnight orthokeratology.

Takahiro Hiraoka1, Chikako Okamoto, Yuko Ishii, Tetsuhiko Kakita, Tetsuro Oshika.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate relationships among contrast sensitivity function, ocular higher-order aberration, and myopic correction in eyes undergoing overnight orthokeratology for myopia.
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 46 eyes of 23 patients undergoing orthokeratology. Inclusion criteria were spherical equivalent refraction between -1.00 and -4.00 diopters (D), refractive astigmatism up to 1.00 D, and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity function were determined before and 3 months after initiation of the procedure. We measured three indices of contrast sensitivity function: contrast sensitivity, low-contrast visual acuity, and letter contrast sensitivity with the CSV-1000 charts (Vector Vision Co., Greenville, OH). Area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) was calculated from the contrast sensitivity data.
RESULTS: Orthokeratology significantly improved logMAR uncorrected visual acuity (P < 0.0001; paired t-test) but significantly increased ocular higher-order aberrations (P < 0.0001) and decreased contrast sensitivity function, including AULCSF (P < 0.0001), low-contrast visual acuity (P = 0.0025), and letter contrast sensitivity (P < 0.0001; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The induced changes in AULCSF, low-contrast visual acuity, and letter contrast sensitivity by orthokeratology showed significant correlation with changes in third-order (Pearson r = -0.430, P = 0.0026; r = 0.423, P = 0.0031; and Spearman r(s) = -0.351, P = 0.0186, respectively), fourth-order (r = -0.418, P = 0.0035; r = 0.425, P = 0.0029; and r(s) = -0.566, P = 0.0001, respectively), and total higher-order (r = -0.460, P = 0.0011; r = 0.471, P = 0.0008; and r(s) = -0.434, P = 0.0036, respectively) aberrations. The induced changes in contrast sensitivity function and higher-order aberrations significantly correlated with the amount of myopic correction (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Orthokeratology significantly increases ocular higher-order aberrations and compromises contrast sensitivity function, depending on the amount of myopic correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17251449     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  19 in total

1.  Ultrasound-based quantification of vitreous floaters correlates with contrast sensitivity and quality of life.

Authors:  Jonathan Mamou; Christianne A Wa; Kenneth M P Yee; Ronald H Silverman; Jeffrey A Ketterling; Alfredo A Sadun; J Sebag
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli-Robson test?

Authors:  Fabrizio Zeri; Paolo Calcatelli; Eleonora Funaro; Marialuisa Martelli; Shehzad A Naroo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Short-term effects of overnight orthokeratology on corneal epithelial permeability and biomechanical properties.

Authors:  Thao N Yeh; Harry M Green; Yixiu Zhou; Julie Pitts; Britney Kitamata-Wong; Sophia Lee; Shiyin L Wang; Meng C Lin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Effects of higher-order aberrations on contrast sensitivity in normal eyes of a large myopic population.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Zhao; Shi-Ming Li; Jing Lu; Hong-Min Song; Jing Zhang; Yue-Hua Zhou; Ning-Li Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Julia S Benoit; Kelsie B Morrison; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Spatial frequencies used in Landolt C orientation judgments: relation to inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Kenneth R Alexander
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Short-term changes in light distortion in orthokeratology subjects.

Authors:  Elena Santolaria Sanz; Alejandro Cerviño; Antonio Queiros; Cesar Villa-Collar; Daniela Lopes-Ferreira; Jose Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Corneal Aberrations, Contrast Sensitivity, and Light Distortion in Orthokeratology Patients: 1-Year Results.

Authors:  Elena Santolaria-Sanz; Alejandro Cerviño; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Corneal Elevation, Power, and Astigmatism to Assess Toric Orthokeratology Lenses in Moderate-to-High Astigmats.

Authors:  Erin S Tomiyama; Anna-Kaye Logan; Kathryn Richdale
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.152

10.  Biometry and visual function of a healthy cohort in Leipzig, Germany.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Zocher; Jos J Rozema; Nicole Oertel; Jens Dawczynski; Peter Wiedemann; Franziska G Rauscher
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.