V Jobin1, P Mayer, F Bellemare. 1. Laboratoire du sommeil, CHUM-Hôtel-Dieu, 3840 St-Urbain, Montréal, Québec, Canada H2W 1T8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A portable monitor for the automated analysis of episodic nocturnal oxygen saturation or SpO(2) (the Remmers Sleep Recorder, RSR) has been proposed for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea (OSAH). A study was undertaken to compare the diagnostic performance of automated analysis with the manual scoring of polygraphic data by a more comprehensive respiratory monitor (the Suzanne recorder) used simultaneously in their intended home environment. METHODS: The respiratory disturbance indexes of the two monitors were compared in 94 consecutive adult patients suspected of having OSAH and who were deemed eligible for home-based investigation. RESULTS: The RSR overestimated the number of respiratory events associated with a >or=4% fall in SpO(2) by 13% (p<0.005) but underestimated the number of apnoeas and hypopnoeas defined on the basis of respiratory variables alone or their association with a >or=4% fall in SpO(2) or autonomic arousals by 38-48% (p<0.0001). In addition to these significant biases, the limits of agreement in all instances were wide, indicating a poor concurrence between the two monitors. CONCLUSION: The automated analysis of SpO(2) with the RSR cannot be substituted for the manual scoring of polygraphic data with the more comprehensive respiratory monitor in the diagnosis of OSAH in an ambulatory home-based setting.
BACKGROUND: A portable monitor for the automated analysis of episodic nocturnaloxygen saturation or SpO(2) (the Remmers Sleep Recorder, RSR) has been proposed for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea (OSAH). A study was undertaken to compare the diagnostic performance of automated analysis with the manual scoring of polygraphic data by a more comprehensive respiratory monitor (the Suzanne recorder) used simultaneously in their intended home environment. METHODS: The respiratory disturbance indexes of the two monitors were compared in 94 consecutive adult patients suspected of having OSAH and who were deemed eligible for home-based investigation. RESULTS: The RSR overestimated the number of respiratory events associated with a >or=4% fall in SpO(2) by 13% (p<0.005) but underestimated the number of apnoeas and hypopnoeas defined on the basis of respiratory variables alone or their association with a >or=4% fall in SpO(2) or autonomic arousals by 38-48% (p<0.0001). In addition to these significant biases, the limits of agreement in all instances were wide, indicating a poor concurrence between the two monitors. CONCLUSION: The automated analysis of SpO(2) with the RSR cannot be substituted for the manual scoring of polygraphic data with the more comprehensive respiratory monitor in the diagnosis of OSAH in an ambulatory home-based setting.
Authors: W Ward Flemons; Michael R Littner; James A Rowley; Peter Gay; W McDowell Anderson; David W Hudgel; R Douglas McEvoy; Daniel I Loube Journal: Chest Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: W Ward Flemons; Neil J Douglas; Samuel T Kuna; Daniel O Rodenstein; John Wheatley Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: S Redline; V K Kapur; M H Sanders; S F Quan; D J Gottlieb; D M Rapoport; W H Bonekat; P L Smith; J P Kiley; C Iber Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nancy A Collop; Sharon L Tracy; Vishesh Kapur; Reena Mehra; David Kuhlmann; Sam A Fleishman; Joseph M Ojile Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2011-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062