Literature DB >> 17250485

Willingness-to-pay stated preferences for telemedicine versus in-person visits in patients with a history of psoriasis or melanoma.

Abrar A Qureshi1, Heather A Brandling-Bennett, Eve Wittenberg, Suephy C Chen, Arthur J Sober, Joseph C Kvedar.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate willingness-to-pay stated preferences for telemedicine versus in-person clinic visits in patients with a history of psoriasis or melanoma. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 92 (n = 92) adult participants with a history of psoriasis or melanoma recruited primarily from hospital-based dermatology practices. Data were collected on patient demographics and willingness-to-pay responses. In a combined analysis for patients with melanoma and psoriasis, 73% of participants preferred telemedicine over in-person visits if access to the physician was quicker. The majority of those choosing telemedicine (95%) were also willing to pay a median of 25 dollars(5 dollars-500 dollars) out-of-pocket. When time to see a physician was held constant for telemedicine and in-person visits, 19% of participants preferred telemedicine and about 58% of these participants were willing to pay a median of 25 dollars(10 dollars-125 dollars) out-of-pocket. This preliminary work suggests that dermatology patients prefer telemedicine if this modality provides quicker access to their physician.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17250485     DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  8 in total

1.  Service design attributes affecting diabetic patient preferences of telemedicine in South Korea.

Authors:  Hayoung Park; Yucheong Chon; Jongsu Lee; Ie-Jung Choi; Kun-Ho Yoon
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Video or In-Clinic Consultation? Selection of Attributes as Preparation for a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Key Stakeholders.

Authors:  Irit Chudner; Margalit Goldfracht; Hadass Goldblatt; Anat Drach-Zahavy; Khaled Karkabi
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Pilot study of providing online care in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Steven C Adamson; John W Bachman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Patient-centered online management of psoriasis: a randomized controlled equivalency trial.

Authors:  Cindy J Chambers; Kory K Parsi; Clayton Schupp; April W Armstrong
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Patient perceived value of teleophthalmology in an urban, low income US population with diabetes.

Authors:  Rajeev S Ramchandran; Sule Yilmaz; Evelyn Greaux; Ann Dozier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Patients' preferences for telemedicine versus in-clinic consultation in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  I Mozes; D Mossinson; H Schilder; D Dvir; O Baron-Epel; A Heymann
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-02-22

7.  Assessment of a Business-to-Consumer (B2C) model for Telemonitoring patients with Chronic Heart Failure (CHF).

Authors:  Andrija S Grustam; Hubertus J M Vrijhoef; Ron Koymans; Philipp Hukal; Johan L Severens
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Digital Health in Melanoma Posttreatment Care in Rural and Remote Australia: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Audrey Rollin; Brad Ridout; Andrew Campbell
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.