Literature DB >> 17249827

Design of Gd(III)-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents: static and transient zero-field splitting contributions to the electronic relaxation and their impact on relaxivity.

Meriem Benmelouka1, Alain Borel, Loick Moriggi, Lothar Helm, André E Merbach.   

Abstract

A multiple-frequency (9.4-325 GHz) and variable-temperature (276-320 K) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) study on low molecular weight gadolinium(III) complexes for potential use as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents has been performed. Peak-to-peak linewidths Delta Hpp and central magnetic fields have been analyzed within the Redfield approximation taking into account the static zero-field splitting (ZFS) up to the sixth order and the transient ZFS up to the second order. Longitudinal electronic relaxation is dominated by the static ZFS contribution at low magnetic fields (B < 0.3 T) and by the transient ZFS at high magnetic fields (B > 1.5 T). Whereas the static ZFS clearly depends on the nature of the chelating ligand, the transient ZFS does not. For the relatively fast rotating molecules studied water proton relaxivity is mainly limited by the fast rotation and electronic relaxation has only a marked influence at frequencies below 30 MHz. From our EPR results we can conclude that electronic relaxation will have no influence on the efficiency of Gd(III)-based MRI contrast agents designed for studies at very high magnetic fields (B > 3T).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17249827     DOI: 10.1021/jp0633289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  8 in total

1.  Towards the rational design of MRI contrast agents: electron spin relaxation is largely unaffected by the coordination geometry of gadolinium(III)-DOTA-type complexes.

Authors:  Alain Borel; Jonathan F Bean; Robert B Clarkson; Lothar Helm; Loïck Moriggi; A Dean Sherry; Mark Woods
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.236

2.  Towards interpretation of intermolecular paramagnetic relaxation enhancement outside the fast exchange limit.

Authors:  Alberto Ceccon; G Marius Clore; Vitali Tugarinov
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Tunable paramagnetic relaxation enhancements by [Gd(DPA)(3)] (3-) for protein structure analysis.

Authors:  Hiromasa Yagi; Karin V Loscha; Xun-Cheng Su; Mitchell Stanton-Cook; Thomas Huber; Gottfried Otting
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 4.  Paramagnetic Chemical Probes for Studying Biological Macromolecules.

Authors:  Qing Miao; Christoph Nitsche; Henry Orton; Mark Overhand; Gottfried Otting; Marcellus Ubbink
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 72.087

5.  EPR assessment of protein sites for incorporation of Gd(III) MRI contrast labels.

Authors:  Jens O Lagerstedt; Jitka Petrlova; Silvia Hilt; Antonin Marek; Youngran Chung; Renuka Sriram; Madhu S Budamagunta; Jean F Desreux; David Thonon; Thomas Jue; Alex I Smirnov; John C Voss
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Paramagnetic doping of a 7TM membrane protein in lipid bilayers by Gd³⁺-complexes for solid-state NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sandra J Ullrich; Soraya Hölper; Clemens Glaubitz
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Coupling fast water exchange to slow molecular tumbling in Gd3+ chelates: why faster is not always better.

Authors:  Stefano Avedano; Mauro Botta; Julian S Haigh; Dario L Longo; Mark Woods
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 5.165

8.  Gadolinium Complexes as Contrast Agent for Cellular NMR Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Nat Sakol; Ayako Egawa; Toshimichi Fujiwara
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.