OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a new early intervention service for first-episode psychosis on patient characteristics, service use, and hospital costs. METHOD: We examined clinical records of all first admissions to hospitals of patients diagnosed with first-episode psychoses (nonaffective) over a 3-year period before and after the introduction of an early intervention service, the Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP), in a defined catchment area. We examined demographic, clinical, and service use indices covering a 2-year period subsequent to the index admission for each patient. RESULTS: Patients in the post-PEPP phase were significantly younger (P < 0.01), were more often male (P < 0.05), and were less likely to be admitted to hospital with an involuntary status (P < 0.05) or with injuries (P < 0.05) at the time of their first hospital admission. Over the 2 years following the initial admission, post-PEPP patients had significantly fewer admissions to a regular psychiatric service (P < 0.001) and made significantly fewer visits to the hospital emergency department (P < 0.01). There was a significant mean reduction in costs per case of regular hospital bed use ($1028.49, SD 528.02, compared with $792.28, SD 528.02; P < 0.01) and emergency visits ($519.18, SD 353.79, compared with $353.79, SD 345.0; P < 0.01). Time series analyses followed by Chow tests failed to confirm that these cost changes could be attributed specifically to the introduction of an early intervention service. CONCLUSION: Introduction of a specialized early intervention program may be beneficial to patients and to the health care system. To evaluate the cost-benefit ratio of early intervention services, longer term and more detailed data may be required.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a new early intervention service for first-episode psychosis on patient characteristics, service use, and hospital costs. METHOD: We examined clinical records of all first admissions to hospitals of patients diagnosed with first-episode psychoses (nonaffective) over a 3-year period before and after the introduction of an early intervention service, the Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP), in a defined catchment area. We examined demographic, clinical, and service use indices covering a 2-year period subsequent to the index admission for each patient. RESULTS:Patients in the post-PEPP phase were significantly younger (P < 0.01), were more often male (P < 0.05), and were less likely to be admitted to hospital with an involuntary status (P < 0.05) or with injuries (P < 0.05) at the time of their first hospital admission. Over the 2 years following the initial admission, post-PEPP patients had significantly fewer admissions to a regular psychiatric service (P < 0.001) and made significantly fewer visits to the hospital emergency department (P < 0.01). There was a significant mean reduction in costs per case of regular hospital bed use ($1028.49, SD 528.02, compared with $792.28, SD 528.02; P < 0.01) and emergency visits ($519.18, SD 353.79, compared with $353.79, SD 345.0; P < 0.01). Time series analyses followed by Chow tests failed to confirm that these cost changes could be attributed specifically to the introduction of an early intervention service. CONCLUSION: Introduction of a specialized early intervention program may be beneficial to patients and to the health care system. To evaluate the cost-benefit ratio of early intervention services, longer term and more detailed data may be required.
Authors: Kelly K Anderson; Aristotle Voineskos; Benoit H Mulsant; Tony P George; Kwame J Mckenzie Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: David S Mandell; Molly K Candon; Ming Xie; Steven C Marcus; Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Andrew J Epstein; Colleen L Barry Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Robert Rosenheck; Douglas Leslie; Kyaw Sint; Haiqun Lin; Delbert G Robinson; Nina R Schooler; Kim T Mueser; David L Penn; Jean Addington; Mary F Brunette; Christoph U Correll; Sue E Estroff; Patricia Marcy; James Robinson; Joanne Severe; Agnes Rupp; Michael Schoenbaum; John M Kane Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2016-01-31 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Jason R Randall; Sherri Vokey; Hal Loewen; Patricia J Martens; Marni Brownell; Alan Katz; Nathan C Nickel; Elaine Burland; Dan Chateau Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 9.306