Literature DB >> 17244423

Chest pain and subsequent consultation for coronary heart disease: a prospective cohort study.

Peter R Croft1, Elaine Thomas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chest pain may not be reported to general practice but could be an important first sign of coronary heart disease (CHD). AIMS: To determine whether self-reported chest pain predicts future consultation for CHD in those with no history of consultation for CHD. DESIGN OF STUDY: Population-based study, with 7 year's follow up by GP record linkage.
SETTING: General practice in North Staffordshire.
METHOD: A survey, including the Rose angina questionnaire, was mailed to 4002 adults. Linked GP records used to identify responders with no record of CHD (G3 Read code or British National Formulary code for nitrate use) in the 32 months before the survey to form the sample for a 7-year prospective study. 'Survival' was compared in those with and without self-reported chest pain up to the earliest date of GP diagnosis of CHD, death, or end of the study period.
RESULTS: The survey response was 65% and 2348 participants gave permission to access their GP records. Of these, 2229 had no prior consultation for CHD. From the questionnaire, 558 reported chest pain of which 186 reported exertional pain and 103 met the criteria for angina. When followed prospectively, incidence of CHD consultations was higher in those with any chest pain definition, compared with no pain, and continued to be so for 7 years subsequently. Although these associations were strongly age related, self-reported symptoms were found to be an independent risk factor for future consultation for CHD.
CONCLUSION: This study highlighted that self-reported chest pain is a marker of future CHD. The usefulness of early identification of people with this symptom remains to be established.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angina; chest pain; coronary disease; epidemiology; referral and consultation; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17244423      PMCID: PMC2032699     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  9 in total

1.  Identifying patients with ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional study of paper and computerised medical records.

Authors:  J Gray; A Majeed; S Kerry; G Rowlands
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-02

2.  Data quality of general practice electronic health records: the impact of a program of assessments, feedback, and training.

Authors:  Mark Porcheret; Rhian Hughes; Dai Evans; Kelvin Jordan; Tracy Whitehurst; Helen Ogden; Peter Croft
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-10-05       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Repeatability and validity of the Rose questionnaire for angina pectoris in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  P D Sorlie; L Cooper; P J Schreiner; W Rosamond; M Szklo
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Using the WHO (Rose) angina questionnaire in cardiovascular epidemiology.

Authors:  D G Cook; A G Shaper; P W MacFarlane
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Social and gender variation in the prevalence, presentation and general practitioner provisional diagnosis of chest pain.

Authors:  H Richards; A McConnachie; C Morrison; K Murray; G Watt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Possible angina detected by the WHO angina questionnaire in apparently healthy men with a normal exercise ECG: coronary heart disease or not? A 26 year follow up study.

Authors:  J Bodegard; G Erikssen; J V Bjornholt; D Thelle; J Erikssen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Non-cardiac chest pain: prevalence, risk factors, impact and consulting--a population-based study.

Authors:  G D Eslick; M P Jones; N J Talley
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Increased mortality among women with Rose angina who have not presented with ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  Vicci Owen-Smith; Philip C Hannaford; Alison M Elliott
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  "Nonspecific" chest pain associated with high long-term mortality: results from the primary prevention study in Göteborg, Sweden.

Authors:  L Wilhelmsen; A Rosengren; M Hagman; G Lappas
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.882

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Patients' descriptions of angina symptoms: a qualitative study of primary care patients.

Authors:  Melvyn M Jones; Claire Somerville; Gene Feder; Gill Foster
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk and Management of Patients Recorded in Primary Care With Unattributed Chest Pain: An Electronic Health Record Study.

Authors:  Kelvin P Jordan; Trishna Rathod-Mistry; James Bailey; Ying Chen; Lorna Clarson; Spiros Denaxas; Richard A Hayward; Harry Hemingway; Danielle A van der Windt; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 6.106

3.  Prognosis of undiagnosed chest pain: linked electronic health record cohort study.

Authors:  Kelvin P Jordan; Adam Timmis; Peter Croft; Danielle A van der Windt; Spiros Denaxas; Arturo González-Izquierdo; Richard A Hayward; Pablo Perel; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-04-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.